Talk:Neil Simon Theatre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNeil Simon Theatre has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starNeil Simon Theatre is part of the Active Broadway theaters series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2022Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2023Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Neil Simon Theatre, a New York City landmark, was the first Broadway theater renamed after a living playwright?
Current status: Good article

My rewrite of this article is a work in progress. Please be patient.[edit]

My rewrite of this article is a work in progress as I have time. I plan to use a format similar to what I used for the Mark Hellinger Theatre. Please be patient.

Thanks. JGKlein (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Neil Simon Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Theatre, now Neil Simon Theatre
Alvin Theatre, now Neil Simon Theatre

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Substantial expansion, on 37 (!) sources, subscription sources accepted AGF. I prefer ALT3, but would like to add "landmark", and/or that Simon's plays were performed there. What a playlist! On it's way to GA, I believe. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot: The image is licensed, and a fine illustration, - well deserved to have this beauty pictured. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: Thanks for the review, I really appreciate it. I have suggested some alts under ALT3. Epicgenius (talk) 20:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for thinking long, all acceptable, - my preference is ALT3a. I don't like the author's name twice in ALT3b, am not happy with "landmarked", and am no friend of talking about the first name when the article name is the second, but that may be just me, so no strike ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Neil Simon Theatre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPClegg (talk · contribs) 17:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

</noinclude>

  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.