Talk:Naugahyde

Textile Arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Carolyn Muse Grant (2009-07-09). "Naugahyde's durability, versatility endures". Las Vegas Review-Journal. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Nauga myth[edit]

FYI

– Section heading added by Undead Shambles (talk) 22:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So was the existence of a marketing campain citing the 'nauga' is an urban myth? Could this be proven by citing a marketing person from Uniroyal. Given how recent this was, shouldn't be to hard to find out.

By coincidence I've just rewritten this. The original wording implied that the marketing campaign itself became a myth, rather than the campaign's claim that the material came from the hide of the Nauga. The campaign was real; the Nauga was myth. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

song references[edit]

I've removed all but the first one, which ties into the point about the nauga and the marketing campaign. I didn't see the point of the other ones. Loggie (talk) 12:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

editor: Is there a policy...[edit]

When Naugahyde was developed, in the nineteen-thirties, the company's name was US Rubber. Is there a policy on making references to a company's name agree with the current-day name? Rainbow-five (talk) 02:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How big was a roll?[edit]

The main page of this article would be improved if there were a discussion about the cost of a yard of naugahyde compared to a comparable amount of real leather. And how many yards could you buy when it first came out? Two hundred yards? Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 05:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Naugahyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]