Talk:Nationality Rooms

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Pittsburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Pittsburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject University of PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dacia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles

What are the two rooms not in use?[edit]

Nationality Room Data[edit]

Here's a photo I took in the Nationality rooms. It didn't turn out well, and probably is only useful for the data it contains: Image:Cathedral Plaque.jpg Hope it can be helpful for the article here--TheZachMorrisExperience (talk) 05:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslav room[edit]

I have some questions about the carpet with the swastika design. I assume it is the Pirot rug donated by the Yugoslavian government for the room's dedication (see [1]), but I'm not sure it is in the room any more. The same with the seat cushions. These may have been removed to preserve them from deterioration due to use. See the photo of the room where the guest/professor's chairs do not seem to have cushions, whereas they do in earlier publicity photos. Can anyone confirm this? CrazyPaco (talk) 04:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For that room the present have no bearing. It is the room stuck in history. If we are not to mention the rug and the chair cushions which are part of the overall design of the room, this would be making a cardinal mistake, which would lead to obvious mentioning of other developments that the present and the future will bring. We might add a disclaimer that the items were present for the dedication, the 1947 book still depict in color the rug, which is placed on the floor, below the professors "catedra". Why making an issue over the present, when you insist that the room has nothing, even with the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia despite the fact that Yugoslav diaspora existed in the time Josip Broz Tito visited U.S.A. and met with Mr. President Kennedy. The Government of SFRY maintained cordial relations with U.S.A. and the Yugoslav diaspora in that country. -- Imbris (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the present status of the rooms actually have the most important bearing on the article. All the other room descriptions in the article are based on the current contents, condition and function (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Internal consistency), which fits with the intent of Wikipedia to provide the most up-to-date and accurate information possible. This does not mean that changes to the room or original design should be excluded, but such things should be noted as such to avoid confusion. A rug on the floor is definitely not part of the current configuration of the room, although it may be displayed elsewhere in the room, such as in a display cabinet. I am not located in Pittsburgh to verify this. However, if the absence of the rug and seat cushions are verified, and information regarding their previous inclusion in the room is left in the article, these items should clearly be noted as original elements that are no longer a part of the room. As an aside, it would be extremely interesting to find out what happened to these things if they are no longer there though. Again, I have no problem with their inclusion, I'm just trying to ensure that the article is as accurate as possible in the description of all the rooms. I'm not sure what your point is on the SFRY, but Yugoslavia is a much more accurate wikilink than any one political entity since the room was designed prior to the SFRY, and has existed throughout the many changes that have taken place. Actually, Yugoslavs might be a better leading wikilink, since no such titled political entity exits any longer. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly enough wikilink to [[Yugoslavs]] is not a good option. Yugoslavs are mentioned in the last sentence of the last paragraph, this should be fine. In that sentence is also listed what is written on the first page of any book, paper, etc. on Yugoslav Room, that Yugoslavs take great proudness about the region, from where they come. I have listed only those that can be sourced, but feel Macedonians should also be listed, maybe Vojvodinians and Herzegovinians and Istrians too. That is if we want to update the sittuation as it was in SFRY.

Second, the embedded external link violates WP:EL. This is a small objection to the lede of the article, where a tour of the Rooms is forced into the content.

Returning to the rug, it is quite interesting and should be better contextualized, also that Pirot part is very nice. I have read about it at the link you provided, thanks for that piece of valuable info.

This is all for now. Bye. -- Imbris (talk) 01:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imbris, I agree the embedded link is bad and will remove it. It is an old hold over from when the article was still a part of Cathedral of Learning. Good reasoning on the Yugoslavs link. Nice edits btw. The picture placement is much improved too. It would be nice to expand the other entries so that the other images could do less text pinching. Your edits have greatly improved the Yogoslav section so thank you. CrazyPaco (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nationality Rooms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]