This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
While the two listings are rather similar, I'm leaning toward saying that there really are two: they were added to the Register at different times, and they have different locations assigned — it's not a matter of them having identical names. Nyttend (talk) 05:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to differ. Please see the infobox. The 1985 date is the date listed on the NRHP as part of the Chesapeake Bay Skipjack Fleet TR. The 1994 date is the date designated a a NHL. Tilghman and Tilghman Island are the same place. The specific location changed ... it is a boat. Therefore, I am going to revert back to my previous edit, combining these two entries. See also [1]
Sorry, I wasn't considering the should-be-obvious fact that the location difference could be because boats can move...Thanks for giving it a little more thought :-) Now no more complaints, except against the NRIS for maintaining two entries for one object. Nyttend (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And sorry, too, for reverting the historic district disambiguation...I guess I didn't see that you fixed it. Nyttend (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No apology needed. Thank you for all the help and assistance you've given me in seeing that the MD NRHP listings are complete and accurate ... best wishes--Pubdog (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
