Talk:Nassi–Shneiderman diagram

Nassi-Shneiderman diagrams are only rarely used. Their abstraction level is close to structured program code and modifications require the whole diagram to be redrawn.

Why does it have to be completely redrawn? --Abdull 15:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nassi-Shneiderman diagrams are only rarely used....in english speaking countries.

Do we read these from top to bottom?[edit]

Based on scanning through the article, I guess these diagrams are meant to be read starting from the top and working downwards. Is this correct? Jowa fan (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pseudo-code[edit]

Would it be useful to add pseudocode to the examples, so it becomes clearer what the diagrams represent? Rchard2scout (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference not valid =[edit]

The reference "Isermann" ist not valid, this is a collection of more than 60 papers; please include the correct reference See -> http://books.google.de/books/about/10th_Triennial_world_congress_of_the_Int.html?id=mkJGAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

Or select other.

--Ayloxs (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]