Talk:Narrative structure of The Lord of the Rings

Narrative structure of The Lord of the Rings has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 28, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Frodo's Five Homely Houses.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Narrative structure of The Lord of the Rings/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 16:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I have done a minor copyedit; feel free to discuss any changes you might disagree with.

Thank you.

"balanced pair...threads of story" I think semicolons would be better than commas here. Also for the body.

Done.

"the "Nation's best-loved book." You should mention where the survey was conducted.

Added.

"and the two supported each other" would be better as "and that the two support each other"

Done.

"inevitability of loss...fade" this is confusing, it needs a colon somewhere in there

Edited ("like" to "as").

The images are all licensed and used correctly.

Noted.

The references are all reliable and formatted correctly.

Noted.

Spotchecks:
- Seiler, Andy (16 December 2003). "'Rings' comes full circle". USA Today. Verifies all claims made.
- Diver, Krysia (5 October 2004). "A lord for Germany". The Sydney Morning Herald. Verifies all claims made.
- Nepveu, Kate (16 December 2008). "LotR re-read: Fellowship I.2, 'The Shadow of the Past'". Tor.com. Verifies all claims made.
- Drout, Michael D. C. (2004). "Tolkien's Prose Style and its Literary and Rhetorical Effects". Tolkien Studies. Verifies all claims made.

Noted.

That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All done to date. Many thanks for the review! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will be passing. AryKun (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]