Talk:Nannup, Western Australia

Australia: Places / Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nannup, Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Western Australia South West

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Australia South West, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the South West on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Western Australia South WestWikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia South WestTemplate:WikiProject Western Australia South WestWestern Australia South West articles

November 2006[edit]

The dot map is a placeholder - without it the distances in the infobox look bad (Nannup's unusual in requiring *five*). If you have a photograph of the town, don't hesitate to replace it :) Orderinchaos78 ^(t|c) 17:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lead - town vs shire[edit]

@JarrahTree: Given that the Shire of Nannup has a separate article, and this article is about the town only, I think it reasonable to separate the the mention of the shire from the lead sentence, as I did in this edit. Per MOS:FIRST:

the first sentence should give a concise definition [of the subject]
Keep the first sentence focused on the subject

The subject of this article is the town, not the shire.

Also, having a lead of "Nannup is a town and shire..." would appear contrary in principle to MOS:LEAD#Scope of article, in particular: ... necessary to identify material that is not within scope. ... at the end of the lead to avoid cluttering and confusing the first paragraph. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you need to get over it mitch - I did not see the diff re the lead sentence, and removed the edit in total rather than the rather uninformed edit about the film that utilised the streets of Nannup. JarrahTree 04:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-applied my change to the lead section.
I stand by my comments on your talk page.
Mitch Ames (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]