Talk:Namik Glacier

India: Uttarakhand / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Glaciers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues[edit]

Hi all, hope somebody will see this. I was researching this article online to find references to use for it and to expand if possible. Hwever when I cam upon this website: http://www.uttarakhandtourism.net/glacier_namik.htm it has the exact same wording.

Now I know it is quite common for websites just to copy and paste from wikipedia, however what makes me think it is visa versa is that the other online article has it's same info way doewn from its intro which makes me think/assume that it is the original.

Any thoughts anyone? Also if anybody could tell me the wiki-coding for giving a "copyright" tag please let me know.

Kindest regards and best wishes, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

It's probably most likely that the website copied their info from here...the original version of this article dates from 2005...as shown here and the website has probably been updated since as has this article. Also, some websites have the same authors as Wikipedia. However, the article has zero references and that is a problem.--MONGO 18:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google books returns a few sources...here....at least one source may be a copy from this article...as shown but it could be the other way around.--MONGO 18:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]