Talk:NSA cryptography

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Cryptography: Computer science

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Discusses only positive work, and is incomrehensible to the average reader[edit]

This entry appears to present a few problems:

It discusses the NSA's contributions to cryptography, but does not discuss the apparent undermining of cryptography that has also taken place (e.g. in NIST publications recommending the use of a specific Diffie-Hellman curve without any obvious reason).
The article is not written for an audience with a general education; it appears targeted to an audience that knows the subject quite thoroughly before approaching this article.

Would it be possible for someone who has a clue about this subject and about writing for non-technical audiences to perhaps review the article with the aim of addressing these issues and perhaps adding a few references? The third reference - to Ars Technica - is a good start, and I suggest that there should be plenty of material about the NSA's undermining of cryptography. (Was the NSA also involved in the export proscription during the 80s and 90s, by which no cryptographic technology could be exported that US authorities could not break?)

Thank you, and All Hail the Experts! Ambiguosity (talk) 10:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]