Talk:NSA Suite A Cryptography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hi. Whoever removed the 'legacy algorithms,' such as BATON, could you please tell me why? This entire topic is shrouded in secrecy, and I'd like to know what your sources were. 76.180.120.161 18:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds stupid[edit]

NSA knows best that "security through obscurity" never works. To say they don't release it is simply asking Wikileaks to the waltz and surely they will leak it. Some 2nd year college student will then find a hole in the algorithm and it gets broken and chicom have a field day over USA. Much better to release any crypto and have the academic community analyse it to death, so no security hole remains hidden. 87.97.105.199 (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot, that the NSA is the biggest employer for mathematicians (at least in the US), so they do have the knowledge to probe their own algorithms--Mirrakor (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

While this subject may not merit its own page, I believe it is significant enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. The simple fact that it pertains to the cryptographic technologies used to secure the secrets of one of the world's most powerful nations is perhaps not enough to overcome the dearth of public information about it, but it is also significant in its relation to its more popular sibling: NSA Suite B Cryptography. That suite is widely used in the public and private sectors around the world, it is fully publicly documented, and furthermore the Wikipedia page about it is at least mediocre. I propose that this page be merged into that one in order for Wikipedia to provide the public with as complete a picture of the NSA's cryptographic suites as possible. -Peter 128.84.125.25 (talk) 00:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NSA Suite A Cryptography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]