Talk:NA-123 Lahore-VII

Respected sir[edit]

There are always 3 positions. Ranaumershahzadgoga (talk) 01:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ranaumershahzadgoga: It is not always necessary to list three positions. The third placed candidate should have competitive votes to be listed otherwise it is just not encyclopedic to list a candidate with nominal number of votes and increases clutter on pages. The second placed candidate have 50,000 votes and yours are 2,000. Not competitive enough in my opinion to list. @Masterpha and Saqib:, you being big contributors in Pakistani politics topic, please give your opinion, should we list this candidate with 2,000 votes separately? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it make sense to list third placed candidate if there's close contest between second and third. --Saqib (talk) 05:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response but I agree with Sheriff that if the third candidate is not competitive enough in relation to the top two then it shouldn’t be listed. маsтегрна таLк 23:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]