Talk:Music Box Dancer

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

World Cup Theme[edit]

Most British people know this music as the BBC Theme Music for the 1978 World Cup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.139.146.180 (talk) 06:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

accident[edit]

I heard once from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Kasem that the record was put into a stack of pop records to play by accident and this made it popular. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.146.40.21 (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canada[edit]

In Canada in the summer of 1978, it seemed that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation played MBD a lot on news radio broadcasts (between programs - often the entire song).

Was this due to MBD being popular in Canada before it was popular in the USA? Or was MBD a CBC psuedo-signature composition? (Or did the on-air talent play it when they needed a potty-break?)

An editor with knowledge of the CBC in the mid-to-late 1970s should add a passage if appropriate.

72.82.210.167 (talk) 11:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uses[edit]

Should there be something in the article about how it is used in pop culture and society? For example, it's a popular tune for ice cream trucks. Poldy Bloom (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, although it would need to be sourced. Otherwise, it becomes a list of "I heard it used in so-and-so circumstances ..." - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ice cream trucks play a rotation of a few dozen songs, and every one of them is public domain EXCEPT this one. I wish someone could explain if there was an error in copyright notice, releasing to public domain, or an error of including this inappropriately. --Will Sandberg (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Music Box Dancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Music Box Dancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511162809/http://www.snpp.com/guides/music.html to http://www.snpp.com/guides/music.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should be "piece" or "instrumental", or even "composition" but not "song".[edit]

Given that this is an instrumental, surely it should not be called a "song". A song is vocal, and it's not a good look for an enyclopedia to follow the ignorant habit of referring to any piece of music as a song - which it does nearly 20 times. Is it going to cause any disagreement if I change it to "piece"?

It is true voices are involved, in at least Frank Mills' original version: but they are heard only part of the time, and used, without words, literally to hold harmony, and never take the tune. I would submit that this level of vocal involvement is insufficient to justify calling the piece a song. At the least, it is dubious, if not wrong, to call it a song; but it would still be entirely correct to call it either a piece or an instrumental, or even a composition.

"Tune" is used a few times, too. It's probably not so bad, but it's not entirely accurate either, because "tune" refers to just the melody, not the composition as a whole. But I'd be inclined to change that, too, when it is clearly the composition that is being referred to.

Any thoughts on this?M.J.E. (talk) 11:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Genre listing should include traditional pop[edit]

Many sources (I'll have to gather them, but one is Amazon's genre categorization) list this as traditional orchestral pop. Granted, it's not quite as traditional sounding as Percy Faith, Henry Mancini, or Hugo Winterhalter but it contains many elements that would have allowed it to work in the 1950s (although in the 1950s it might have been categorized as rock and roll crossover music). But for the late 70s, it's very much traditional pop. 72.72.204.224 (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]