Talk:Multiscale modeling

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The current article is rather unbalanced, in particular concerning the references. This would need to be fixed. Tpl 13:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I think that Multiscale mathematics should be merged into Multiscale modeling. I have a number of reasons:

There is a big overlap between what these articles should cover
Multiscale mathematics currently has no inline citations.

I think a bullet point list of "primary areas of mathematical and algorithmic development" in Multiscale mathematics could be worked into the body of Multiscale modeling. I think the "See also" and "External links" items can be added to the respective lists in the target article.

Yaris678 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yaris678 (talk) 19:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The quote from "Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) for Metals" seems to violate copyright[edit]

The article includes a substantial quote (about 6 paragraphs) from the "Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) for Metals" book. By looking at the beginning of the free preview for that book on Amazon, I can see that it seems to be under a restrictive copyright, and nothing indicates compatibility with CC BY-SA 3.0 nor with the GFDL. I suspect that this quote should be significantly shortened or removed altogether, and the gestalt rephrased in our own words. Jahvascriptmaniac (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this, and, given that no objections have arisen over the course of the year, will remove this long quote. Guy.genin (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Multiscale modeling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]