Talk:Multiplicative cascade
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
I find this article unclearly written to the point of irresponsibility. It asserts, for example, that the limit as L approaches ∞ of something is something, without the slightest attempt to say what the quantity called L is. That's scatterbrained at best. The Martinez reference, on the other hand, is clear about this. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- I tend to agree. You seem to have had a look at Martinez, would you mind fixing the problem? ptrf 11:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptrf (talk • contribs)
Identity of "Monte Carlo rejection scheme"[edit]
Is a "Monte Carlo rejection scheme" the same as the (acceptance)-rejection method? Article's current link is imprecise. 2601:2C0:C280:3E3:2D0B:37A7:425E:8544 (talk) 03:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)