This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
I think this article shows a lot of hard work on the part of the primary author, User:Sing0512. It is polished, has plenty of external links, and covers its subject. However, it reads to me a lot like a vendor's white paper rather than an encyclopedia article. That is, reading it, I get the feeling that it is trying to push me away from conventional DSPs to GPGPUs. Do others get the same feeling? FooCow (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You read the article about 7 years ago. Reading it now, I did not get any kind of advertising vibe. With respect to using GPUs instead of conventional DSPs, my understanding is that DSPs are designed to work in one or two dimensions and that their architecture would not be adequate for high-dimensional systems. Dratman (talk) 03:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
