Talk:Moving to Opportunity

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The author of the article has attempted to do a good job, but has gotten a number of things wrong. Starting with the first sentence, "Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing (MTO) is a program sponsored by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which gives Section 8 housing vouchers to low-income families and gives them counseling and assistance to help them move to low-poverty neighborhoods with better resources than the usual high-poverty neighborhoods that Section 8 voucher holders usually move to."

What is wrong here is the tense. MTO was an experiment, and the experiment is no longer enrolling families. Therefore "MTO *was* a *demonstration* program ... that *gave* Section 8 vouchers" etc.

The author has also missed one of the key points of the experiment. The families were not just "low-income families," they were *very* low-income families with children living in high-poverty public housing projects in large US cities. They were much more disadvantaged than the average low-income family.

In the third sentence, one reads, "Two of the groups received standard counseling while the third group received special assistance with searching for homes in low-poverty areas." This is wrong. One of the groups did not receive any vouchers, and therefore received no counseling at all.

In the second paragraph, one reads, "so nearly all participants in both high-poverty and low-poverty were employed." This is wrong. What the author should have said is that although there was a huge increase in employment in the experimental groups, there was a nearly identical increase in employment among the control group who did not receive any vouchers.

I am the author of the "HUD description" cited in the references, and will be glad to discuss further with the author, the editor, or anybody else. Mark Shroder

Please be bold and edit the page yourself. It's likely nobody else will see this for a long time. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 02:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moving to Opportunity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130415130450/http://www.mtoresearch.org/ to https://www.mtoresearch.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]