Talk:Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (neighborhood)

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1 July 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move pages. (non-admin closure) — YoungForever^(talk) 15:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– While the current titles do describe the content of the articles, they are not in accordance with the usual naming conventions. I was rather surprised to find Mount Washington, Pittsburgh is a redlink. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, this is similar to Lake Mary, California and Lake Mary (California). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hi, I'm the one who split the article originally (see Talk:Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)#Splitting into two articles). I was not aware of any specific guidelines for titles for pages like these at the time when I split the original page. I would be okay with having them renamed to the correct conventions, though. Are the usual naming conventions you mention the ones here? --Hhm8 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.