Talk:Mount Sunapee

United States: New Hampshire / New Hampshire Mountains Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire Mountains (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skiing and Snowboarding Low‑importance

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peak Elevation[edit]

My topographic map conflicts with the elevation listed on the map of trails for the ski area. I'm going by the topo for now, cause it used it for all my information. Feel free to find a different source to cite! -- Protocoldroid 22:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proto[edit]

nice work; the site was needed. i will check out my maps. i have a pic of lake solitude which i will post. i have another shot of the mountain from lake sunapee that you might like more than the one i just posted. please feel free to do with as u wish.

joe 04:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proto[edit]

i put four pics out on wiki. they are as follows

image:LakeSolitude.jpg Image:LakeSolitudeHikers.jpg Image:MtSunapeeataDistance.jpg Image:MountSunapeeWinter.jpg

do any of these appeal to you in lieu of the ones that are on the MountSunapee page?

i asked Ken Gallagher whether i could use the solitude hikers pic with pictures of my grandchildren in it. it is a better reality picture but, of course, i do not want to violate any wiki rules. joe 20:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notes on two pictures used in this page[edit]

both pics are crooked and need a little repair. i plan to do it soon. joe 20:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joe! These photos are great! Really appreciate it. I don't see the crookedness right away, but, if you have the time / the urge, that would be most excellent. -- Protocoldroid 21:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Love the new photo on the left. This article has been gorgeous-ified!! -- Protocoldroid 04:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery[edit]

the gallery was not aesthetically pleasing to me and i havent figured out how to control it wath software. so i eliminated it. i will work on trying to make the pictures fit better. joe 01:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's definitely fine with me, it's looking pretty good at the moment, i'm going to line up the two photos on the left. -- Protocoldroid 13:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs separate article for ski area[edit]

At least, I think so. The mountain ridge is notable in its own right, but the ski area is notable enough not to be jammed in at the end. (So it differs from, say, Crotched Mountain Ski Area, in which the mountain is not notable enough to have an article separate from the ski area) Any objections? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! --Ken Gallager (talk) 00:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, David. I know that User:Jrclark has done a lot of work on New England ski areas; you might want to collaborate with him. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 00:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]