Talk:Motif (narrative)

Question

Why did someone write 'It is Wrong' at the end of the explaination? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.199.3 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

it is because the statement was wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.32.248 (talk) 23:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

My only guess is that people really don't like Motif in their English assigments causing this page to be the taget of constant vandalism. --75.68.36.81 (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

A very vague sentence

Found the following in the page: "The narrative motif is the vehicle of means by which the narrative theme is conveyed." I could not make any sense of it. Can someone who knows please edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.106.40 (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Technique- leitwortstil

The cited work, Peter Heath's review of (more importantly) David Pinault's book "Story-Telling Techniques in the Arabian Nights" does not verify that articles assertion that: "This dates back to the One Thousand and One Nights to connect several tales together in a story cycle and "to shape the constituent members of their story cycles into a coherent whole."[2]". Indeed Mr Pinault's book merely states that the techinique is used in the work 1001 nights and does not say anything about it being the earliest (or indeed even an `early') example of the techinique and in fact references other scholarly work about the techinique being used in older texts. So, this needs changing. (I'll do it if there are no ojections within a few weeks.)

The Green Light

I could be wrong, but isn't the Green Light in the Great Gatsby only a symbol? While it may be mentioned more than one time, it is one object that symbolizes one concept. I think it is therefore a symbol and not a motif. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.227.15 (talk) 23:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Motif (narrative). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916221220/http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~syverson/309-fall95/classpage/bladerunner/mccoy/ to http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~syverson/309-fall95/classpage/bladerunner/mccoy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)