Talk:Mortuary temple of Hatshepsut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of 1997 Terrorist Attack[edit]

Is there any reason for there not to be any reference at all to the 1997 terrorist attack at this site? It was quite "notable". 62 people were killed. At very least it seems there should be mention and link to main article: Luxor massacre --Petzl (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a clearly defined scope. The event has its own article as you've linked. Maybe a link belongs in see also, but otherwise it's an entirely separate topic that isn't discussed in the relevant literature. Mr rnddude (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict between article title and intro[edit]

@Mr rnddude: You just reverted my edit, so maybe you could help clarify this. Currently, the article is titled "Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut". The capitalization suggests that this name is a proper noun, which therefore should be used as rendered there. The infobox mirrors this capitalization. However, the introductory sentence renders the name in sentene case, making the article title seem happenstance and not a proper noun. This is a conflict; all three should use the same rendering, as the capitalization in the title effectively suggests the way the article is linked to from others (as seen, for example, at Deir el-Bahari and Luxor massacre).

In related articles (like Great Temple of the Aten, Luxor Obelisks, Tomb of Aegisthus, and Temple of Thutmose III), the titles are consistently presented as proper nouns in all three positions. Since I have no deeper knowledge about this topic (I came here merely to check the capitalization to use in another article I am currently writing), can you clarify whether the name should be a proper noun or not? If it is, the introductory mention should be capitalized as I did; if not, the article should be moved to mortuary temple of Hatshepsut and the infobox adjusted accordingly. Regards, IceWelder [] 14:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IceWelder - The easiest way to check whether a term is a proper noun is Ngrams. The majority of sources do not capitalize 'mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' in prose. For that matter, the temple of Thutmose III should also be lowercase. The article should not be moved to 'mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' though, but maybe 'Mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' as the first letter of a title should nearly always be capitalized. Whoever originally created the article used title case, though WP:TITLECASE indicates that titles should also use sentence case. I didn't know that either to be honest, I assumed titles used title case. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moving the article sounds good. I initiated a page move request. IceWelder [] 14:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]