Talk:Monteverdi Choir

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Split Bach recordings into Live / studio[edit]

Do you think it might be helpful to split the Bach cantata recordings into Live / Studio? I understand that all of the cantatas were recorded live during the Cantata pilgrimage in one year (2000) but I wonder if earlier Bach cantata CDs are studio recordings. Will the cantatas recorded under Archiv be duplicated when all the recordings from the pilgrimage are released?--Cardinal Allen (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- No, JEG has no rights over the four BCP discs which were released on Archiv and cannot issue them under SDG. In any case, the volume numbering on SDG is sequential beginning on Trinity Sunday (as Bach's cantata cycles did) and account for this. If they were issued as Vols 28-9 - as the next volumes outside the sequence, it would ruin the integrity of the cycle's ordering. They already have technical issues with the Salisbury tapes so the Ascension cantatas will be re-recorded and issued separately from the BCP series. The other recordings on Archiv are all studio (Cantatas 63, 64, 121, 133; 36, 61, 62; 140, 147; 16, 98, 139; 34, 59, 74, 172; 11, 37, 43, 128; 106, 118, 198; 6, 66) and not part of the BCP project, though I think the current table reflects this. For clarity, the following Archiv issued cantatas were BCP: 72, 73, 111, 156; 82, 83, 125, 200; 94, 105, 168; 113, 179, 199. Hope this helps. Chavster01 (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing[edit]

This is missing their recording of The Rake's Progress with Gardiner and the LSO. Leoniceno (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monteverdi Choir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208003538/http://www.monteverdi.co.uk/whats_on/bcp.cfm to http://www.monteverdi.co.uk/whats_on/bcp.cfm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Include the new podcast series?[edit]

Consider including the new podcast series that JEG launched with the Choir in 2020. See here and here. SyLvRuUz (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]