Talk:Mogollon-Datil volcanic field

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mogollon-Datil volcanic field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Socorro magma body[edit]

@Chris.urs-o, Vsmith, and Bejnar: The Socorro magma body paragraph seems out of place in the Mogollon-Datil volcanic field article.

The Socorro magma body is not closely tied to the Mogollon-Datil volcanic field, which ceased activity over 24 million years ago. It is related rather to the Socorro accommodation zone of the Rio Grande Rift. They are not completely unrelated, since the volcanic field and the accommodation zone probably reflect the same ancient structural trend (Morenci lineament), but the link is tenuous.

Rather than remove the paragraph, I'd like to solicit opinions from other editors on what do with the information. Options I see are:

Make explicit the link via a discussion of the Morenci lineament.
Move the information into its own article.
Move the information into the article on the Rio Grande rift.

I'm open to other possibilities. I'm not actually keen on the first, because it seems to blur the focus on the Mogollon-Datil volcanic field and shift it onto a larger feature.

Whichever we do, it needs to be done cleanly so that due attribution is preserved for the original paragraph. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd move the info to the Rio Grande rift article, except that the information is already there in more detail. So just delete. There is no need to take additional action to "preserve the attribution" of a deleted paragraph, as that preservation is already done in this article's history (for what it is worth). See text in Rio Grande rift article:

The Socorro, New Mexico, region of the central rift hosts an inflating mid-crustal sill-like magma body at a depth of 19 km that is responsible for anomalously high earthquake activity in the vicinity, including the largest rift-associated earthquakes in historic times (two events of approximately magnitude 5.8) in July and November 1906. Begin ref: Reid, H.G. (1911). "Remarkable earthquakes in central New Mexico in 1906 and 1907". Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1: 10–16. Begin ref: End ref: Sanford, A.R.; Balch, R.S.; Lin, K.W. (1995). "A seismic anomaly in the Rio Grande Rift near Socorro, New Mexico". 78. Socorro, NM: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Geophysics Open-File Report: 17. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) End ref: Begin ref: Schlue, J.; Aster, R.; Meyer, R. (1996). "A lower-crustal extension to a mid-crustal magma body in the Rio Grande Rift, New Mexico". J. Geophys. Res. 101 (B11): 25, 283–25, 291. Bibcode:1996JGR...10125283S. doi:10.1029/96JB02464. End ref: Earth and space-based geodetic measurements indicate ongoing surface uplift above the Socorro magma body Begin ref: "Socorro Magma Body". Archived from the original on 2010-06-15. End ref: at approximately 2 mm/year. Begin ref: Fialko, Y.; Simons, M. (2001). "Evidence for on-going inflation of the Socorro magma body, New Mexico, from interferometric synthetic aperture radar imaging" (PDF). Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 (18): 3549–3552. Bibcode:2001GeoRL..28.3549F. doi:10.1029/2001GL013318.^{[permanent dead link]} End ref:

So just delete. --Bejnar (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Preserving attribution is important mainly if we move the information, either into its own article or a different article. If we just delete, then of course that's unnecessary. I think you make a good case for just deleting, and I doubt that's going to be controversial, so I'll proceed with it now. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]