Talk:Ministry of Investment (Indonesia)

Indonesia Mid‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 13 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Ministry of Investment to Ministry of Investment (Indonesia). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 13 February 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 12:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Investment → Ministry of Investment (Indonesia) – Undo move; per WP:NCGAL, it is necessary to pre-disambiguate article title with common name since it is possible, there another agency with the same name in the future. In "Ministry of Investment" case, we also have Ministry of Investment (Saudi Arabia) Ckfasdf (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Other possible future agencies are irrelevant, but we do have the Saudia Arabia ministry right now, which gets more pageviews, so this article is not the WP:primary topic. Ministry of Investment should be a dab page. Station1 (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support, but I disagree with your first argument. Refer to WP:NCGAL, "When creating an article with a common title, be sure to disambiguate it properly". Ckfasdf (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom due to the existence of the Saudi Arabian one. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the decision, because Saudi Arabian also have one. Mmnashrullah (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.