Talk:Milling cutter

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[G-code#M03|M03]] The anchor (#M03) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[G-code#M04|M04]] The anchor (#M04) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[G-code#G40|G40 through G42]] The anchor (#G40) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Slab to shell mill[edit]

I've always seen them as shell mills in catalogs when one goes to purchase them, at least here in America. Perhaps the edit should reflect both names, for the sake of international completeness?

The only shell mill I've come across is a shell end mill which is designed to be mounted on a stub arbor. A plain or slab mill is described in this catalog but in particular these course notes (5.4Mb .doc file), around page 28 of 79, describe the cutters along with examples of usage. Finally About Milling Cutters gives a short summary of shell and slab.

I'll retake the photo to emphasise the absence of any end teeth on the slab mill, and will also take a photo showing the side and end view of a shell end mill. — Graibeard^(talk) 00:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The rpm formulas don't seem to match the formulas on the cutting speed page.

Milling cutter versus Reamer[edit]

From the article:

Helix angle: The flutes of a milling cutter are almost always helical. If the flutes were straight, the whole tooth would impact the material at once, causing vibration and reducing accuracy and surface quality. Setting the flutes at an angle allows the tooth to enter the material gradually, reducing vibration. Typically, finishing cutters have a higher rake angle (tighter helix) to give a better finish.

I'm confused here. Isn't a reamer basically a milling cutter in which the flutes are straight? And, isn't a reamer used to add surface quality to a hole? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.0.133 (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are some differences between a milling cutter and a reamer:

A milling cutter usually has helical flutes, while a reamer either has straight flutes or reverse angle flutes.
A milling cutter can cut sideways through material, while a reamer can only expand an existing hole while cutting downwards.
A reamer only cuts with the tapered part, while a mill can cut with all parts of the tooth.

Rocketmagnet (talk) 09:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A good question, with a good answer by Rocketmagnet. The biggest difference is in the way that they're used. Reamers cut very little material, and only by plunging straight down. The tapered leading edge cuts, while the sides burnish. A milling cutter such as an endmill can cut large amounts of material quickly while moving sideways. Both milling cutters and reamers can have straight flutes (or teeth) or helical flutes, depending on exact application. A milling cutter on a horizontal milling arbor can be rather similar in basic shape to a reamer, but the biggest difference is in the toolpaths that they follow. That big difference drives smaller differences such as clearance angles. — ¾-10 02:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate image[edit]

I removed a duplicate image of a shell end mill. There is still one copy in the article. It isn't very good as the picture shows rectangular inserts but usually they are triangular or lozenge shaped. Stub Mandrel (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Milling cutter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927222952/http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/0705rt3.html to http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/0705rt3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]