Talk:Michael DelGiorno
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
As this is a biography of a living person, I have removed all controversial information lacking a source on both sides of the recurring edits. Please find sources before re-adding them.Vaubin 00:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
References?[edit]
What happen to the reference on this page? On an old version they were there listed on the bottom and then they disappeared? I didn't find anything wrong with the wiki code for references. Can anyone else discover what happened? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.83.221 (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
BLP Noticeboard listing[edit]
This article has been listed at the Biographies of living persons noticeboard. - Crockspot 21:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Warning to Malicious POV Editor[edit]
65.102.179.133, please stop the malicious POV (point of view) editing. Please review Wikipedia policy on original sources, and the 3RR rule. Sdth 04:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Tulsa incidents[edit]
I did a google news archive search, and there appears to be adequate sourcing available for inclusion of that material (casino banning, apology), so it's eventually going to get into this article in some form. The problem up to now is the way it has been inserted -- completely POV. Sdth, you might want to take this semiprotection opportunity to research, source, and include it yourself in a neutral way. That might head off a future dispute when the semiprotection inevitably comes off. - Crockspot 05:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Crockspot. I will try to do that ASAP. DelGiorno has a lot of enemies in the Tulsa press, so whatever information is included needs to be neutral and NPOV. Sdth 07:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Neoconservative?[edit]
What is the sourcing for DelGiorno being a "neocon"? I don't see anything "neo" (i.e., socially liberal but pro military-industrial complex) in his views! 75.246.36.14 (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's certainly not in citation 1. I've removed it.--107.203.25.201 (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment[edit]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Michael DelGiorno/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
|---|---|
| even after crockspot discussion with another administrator two days ago, this piece is still horrifically slanted...nothing i added from Tulsa Today, (and there are many other sources easily found about his being banned from all Olklahoma casios, after railing against them, for stealing and 'bad behavor' with a female employee...these verified facts are NOT being included, tho i have respectfully stopped editing this slanderous bit of bufoonery laden blatant synophant p.r.
in fact, after making an admission in the discussion, what happens??? an article, the only one of it's kind, on a smaller and less legitimate paper, gives enormous kudos to the attack jock for his stance against the very casinos he attended and stole from... ...so he lies on the air about all this, gets railroaded out of town, and wiki makes him look like a hero, and even after an entire week, still refuses to put something fair, by THEIR OWN ADMISSION (meaning crockspot and whatever 'official' censors or administrators are working their cheap shots here, and denying others access, even with sourced and documented facts...in the end, it just makes wiki look weak, slanted, unreliable, and deceitful, even in the face of admitted facts by their 'offical' censors... now that you have shown your true colors by disrepecting facts and spewing extremeist propaganda, look at the sewer you've turned this otherwise great resource into... this incident has been documented all the way down the line...i've waited patiently, and according to every rule, but i will publicize not the attack jock religious hack, but the inherent deception and lies ruled over by anonymous 'editors' and 'managers'... crockspot, get real...you advertise yourself as proudly and overtly right wing, and this represents your idea of Republican ideals? lying, hiding the truth, disinformation, censorship, manipulation, deceit...? well maybe it does at that...fix it now, or ap will fix wiki in the minds of fair americans as the sewer, in this regard, that it has become... | |
Last edited at 21:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)