Talk:Michael Davies (Catholic writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't his surname have a capital "D" in the page title? Don't know how to change this, but someone might want to.

Examples of his writing[edit]

Kudos![edit]

I found this a very well-written and balanced article. From one Catholic reader to another, Kudos!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.101.104 (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty more in the Angelus magazine archives:

http://www.sspx.ca/Angelus/

JASpencer 15:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?[edit]

I'm not sure why the notability tag is there. Apart from the inherent notability as a long time chairman of Una Voce International (as well as forming Una Voce America and Una Voce Nigeria) or the amount of third party references, the fact that he got an obituary in the London Times should surely be sufficient evidence of notability, whatever the tagger thinks of his religious views.

JASpencer (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of third party sourcing establishing any notability. Given that the article on Una Voce itself cites no sources whatsoever, his chairmanship of it does nothing to add to his notability. A prominent obituary is useful but, on its own, does not establish notability. HrafnTalkStalk 03:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Issues surrounding traditional Catholicism, the Tridentine Mass, SSPX, etc., have been very much in the news in recent months, which surely enhances Mr Davies's notability as one of the UK's most prominent Catholic traditionalists.Oafc1990 (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: edits by 75.39.52.193[edit]

NOTE: I am reviewing what the intent of these edits are ... including change from Kent to Kentucky. Proofreader77 (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviated list of works[edit]

Why has the comprehensive list of written works been shortened? This was unnecessary and unhelpful. Now there is no way to distinguish between his major and minor works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.63.252.252 (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Because it was excessive, in comparison to the main body of the article.
  2. Because the bulk of it was minor works, mere "booklets".

HrafnTalkStalk(P) 02:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of third-party sources[edit]

I note that ten of the eleven references for this article are from sources within traditionalist Catholicism (the sole exception being The Times obituary). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 19:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make them first party. JASpencer (talk) 22:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and AD2000 is not a trad publication. As well as the headline being misleading the statement is incorrect. JASpencer (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
B. A. Santamaria "founded a magazine through his Thomas More Centre, called A.D. 2000, to argue for traditionalist views." On the "third-party" issue, these sources are from the (small and tight-knit) traditionalist Catholic movement of which Davies was a leading member -- hardly "independent". There is no indication of any substantive notice from mainstream or liberal Catholicism (who would after all be his main opponents), let alone from the world at large (beyond The times obituary). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these references contain a remarkable personal eulogy from Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who became Pope only one year later. Wouldn't this sort of praise make him more notable ? I mean the Ratzinger is a famous Catholic, not just some unknown Cardinal. [1] ADM (talk) 12:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(i) Do you have a reliable source for this "eulogy"? (ii) It would add little notability in terms of WP:GNG (as it adds very little coverage), but might, depending on the prominence of the source that it is published in, be considered to add 'inherent notability'. Whilst Ratzinger is likely to have eulogised a number of prominent Catholics, it is entirely likely that he has also eulogised a number of obscure ones for various reasons (personal relationship, as a favour to a friend, etc, etc). In any case, this article is meant to be a biography, not an obituary, so such eulogies are of very marginal usefulness. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 16:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael Davies (Catholic writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Davies (Catholic writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Davies (Catholic writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]