This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Micaela Diamond is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Hi MJL, can you please clarify the rationale behind your accept? ∯WBGconverse 06:42, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Winged Blades of Godric: My assessment was that this article appears to fail WP:NACTOR but passess the WP:GNG. I therefore figured the likelihood this survives an WP:AFD to be greater than the chance of it failing. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 15:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And, which of the sources do satisfy RS (and thus, lend to a probable passage of GNG)?
FWIW, when an AfC reviewer faces some sources of questionable merit, he/she ought to check RSN. Accordingly, have you read this discussion? Can the result(s) be extrapolated to Theatermania.com and another two sources? Do you find any similar discussion for Playbill? Does this piece help any in further weeding of questionable sources? Are you aware that there exists innumerable sources in this particular area which does precious little except for reprinting Press-Releases and feeding gossip loops? ∯WBGconverse 16:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@WBG: [Thank you for the ping] No previous discussions have shown indication that Playbill is unreliable (Considering they are pretty the authority on most broadway productions, I would consider them very much a WP:RS). The three sources that I felt best built the case for GNG were: Inside Edition, Huffpost, and The Philadelphia Inquirer. All three put the main focus on this actor in regards to her age and appearing on broadway. There being no obvious BLP violations, I did not feel comfortable sending this back to the article drafter with further instruction. The maintenance tags, I feel, were the most appropriate choice for this article moving forward. Is this all about right? I am new to the AFC scene after all. (edit conflict) –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 16:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MJL, I am borderline (but don't deem your accept to be outside of reviewer discretion, either) on the notability of the subject and will probably merge this to The Cher Show (musical) in light of WP:BLP1E and WP:NOPAGE.
That being said, I am satisfied about the three sources, that you chose. I was doubting about whether you took Theatermania.com, Broadwayworld.com et al to be reliable sources, whose coverage lend to a supposed passage of GNG :-( FWIW, Playbill publishes a lot of subtle ad-spam and our article needs improvement; I will be cautious about using it to determine notability.
All's right and regards, ∯WBGconverse 16:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@WBG: lol yeah I was using the three sources I mentioned to determine GNG. Merging is cool with me. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 18:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was doubting about whether you took Theatermania.com, Broadwayworld.com et al to be reliable sources, whose coverage lend to a supposed passage of GNG :-( FWIW, Playbill publishes a lot of subtle ad-spam and our article needs improvement; I will be cautious about using it to determine notability.