Talk:Meteora

Meteora was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 31, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the culture of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eastern Orthodoxy Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anthonynardelli.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete last paragraph[edit]

I visited Meteora for three days just over a year ago and plan to completely revamp this entry from publications I purchased, including posting my pictures. Having said that, the last paragraph now is out of place and if no objection, I plan to delete it. GeoTraveller 01:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

I really think List of monasteries at Meteora needs to be put in this article. I don't believe the list is so big that it should be on its own.--Rastabilly 22:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, go on. On second thought, I'll do it. Cheers!! -Zacharycrimsonwolf 12:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trecherous[edit]

I visited Rousanou/St. Barbara and St. Stephen. They were both easy to get to though St. Stephen had a drop off from it's (railed) "moat" bridge that horrified some fellow travelers. Student7 02:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting. Perhaps, if you took some photographs, you can upload them for the article. --Zacharycrimsonwolf 16:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA failed[edit]

I have failed this GA.

POV in lead “built on spectactular...” The pop culture reference to Bond frankly seems like undue weight.
Overview:Unsourced. Can these be added? Also POV “immense rocks”. Some of the later sentences are very short and need to be merged.
The overview is basically the article so it is strange to be listed in this way. There is very little to the article apart from list (a list of monstaries”). I think more can be said about the individual monasteries. It is also mostly unsourced
References need to be formatted properly and with full information.
Generally needs more information. Since it is a UNESCO heritage site, there should be a lot written about it. Also, the UNESCO listing is usally a big deal, so the process of it being selected should also be mentioned.
Should there be a mention of the tourism at the site?

The main reasons are comprehensiveness and references. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's a bummer. I'll have to do more, then. Thank you for the review, I really needed someone to tell me where to start from. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need help[edit]

This article needs help! If anyone is interested, please leave me a message. Cheers! --Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

It turns out that Cunard (the cruise line) are reproducing the start of this article (and several others) in their daily printed newsletter without citing wiki. One guy in cust svc even claims that this article may have been cribbed from them. Anyone want to help refute this? thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.80.218 (talk) 16:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Movie 12[edit]

Anyone want to put in the fact that Meteora was one of the inspirations for it? Its page on Bulbapedia claims it to be true, so if anyone wants to do a bit of research to see if you could back it up, it should probably be added here. (Added by Beta Zero on BP) 24.190.45.211 (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sea[edit]

An excerpt reads " ...which geologists maintain were made by the waters of a prehistoric sea. Greek historian Herodotus wrote in the 5th century BC that local people believed the plain of Thessaly had once been a sea..." Actually, nearly every place on earth has been underwater at one time or another including most (if not all) of the Himalayas. This needs rewording by someone with a passing familiarity with geology and/or Greece. It sounds naive. My guess is the somewhat out of context paraphrasing was meant to indicate that the land was underwater in recent geologic times, after a "recent" ice age maybe? Can't be too recent - the current shoreline would apply. Student7 (talk) 18:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In this case it's meant that you can recognize the presence of an ancient sea in the current landforms, the plain of Thessaly used to be the seabed. After reading this bit on geology I was quit confused, and after reading somewhere else on wikipedia it said that the sea was there in the Tertiary (between 2,5 and 65 million years ago) instead of the end of the last Ice age (10 000 years ago). Hopefully there are a few clear sources on the origin of the area written by geologists who worked in this part of Greece, because it's all a bit of a mess. --Pietpiet1 (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent move[edit]

Meteora (Greek monasteries) → Meteora — This page was moved to make way for a redirect to a less notable article (Meteora (album)) without discussion. Propose this should be moved back to Meteora. Tomayres (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree 100%. The monasteries are a World Heritage Site for God's sake... Constantine ✍ 19:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back. olivier (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who is builder of Meteora's monasteries[edit]

Dear, historicans, I can say that this text is apsolutely wrong. When you say "In 1344, Athanasios Koinovitis from Mount Athos brought a group of followers to Metéora.", do you think that he is builder of Meteora?!?! Builder can be only leader of some country or state (in this case, John Uroš with his father Simeon Uroš, who promote building of this monastery complex, Athanasios Koinovitis just have been ordered to assemblage group of monks from Atos. One monk to have money to make big complex of monasteries in this time?!?! This is Middle Age! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srdjantodorov93 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Meteora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141206004238/http://www.reviewhype.com/viral/oldest-known-man-made-structure-found-in-greece to http://www.reviewhype.com/viral/oldest-known-man-made-structure-found-in-greece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 August 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. (No support, well-stated opposition.) —BarrelProof (talk) 03:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meteora → Metéora – Seems more proper with the diacritic (and is written that way in the opening sentence and infobox). —BarrelProof (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. In Greek, the diacritic only indicates stress (not the vowel quality), and is commonly used only for scholarly transcriptions, not for general use. Per WP:GREEK#Diacritics, No diacritics should be used in Wikipedia article titles. and indeed they aren't. As I understand, and https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/Meteora confirms, the stress in English pronunciation is on "o", so the diacritic would be additionally misleading. I'm inclined to remove it from the article body and infobox instead, leaving it only in the transcription. No such user (talk) 08:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meteora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150419154101/http://www.revistafelicia.ro/articol_1012281/regina_maria_prima_femeie_la_marea_meteora__fotografii_inedite_din_interiorul_manastirii_facute_chiar_de_regina.html to http://www.revistafelicia.ro/articol_1012281/regina_maria_prima_femeie_la_marea_meteora__fotografii_inedite_din_interiorul_manastirii_facute_chiar_de_regina.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]