Talk:Meridian, Mississippi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMeridian, Mississippi has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 24, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 9, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

My Suggestions for this article[edit]

For the past month or so, several editors have been working together to improve this article. I hope to take this article all the way to Featured Article status, but in order to reach that goal, several changes must be made to the article. I plan to work on most if not all of them, and if anyone else wants to help, here are my suggestions to upgrade this article to FA:

  • Add a culture section. Looking through the list of all the featured articles of geographical places, I see most of them have a culture section. I suggest adding something about the Riley Center, Meridian Little Theatre, music in the city (mentioning Jimmie Rodgers and others), and some of the cultural attractions mentioned in the Sites of Interest section.
 Done
  • Find a way to shrink the lead section while still keeping all the information.
 Done
 Done
  • Find information about Meridian in the 1970s and 80s to eliminate the history gap. I've looked through pages after pages of information about Meridian, but it seems as though the city disappeared between 1964 and 1997. I think, though, that the city was undergoing economic woes from the changing economy. Businesses probably closed and moved away from the city (this is touched on at the end of the "Golden Age" section, but there needs to be some actual dates in the 70s and 80s IMO). I can't find any hard dates for the closures of businesses and other events in this time period, but I'm sure there out there.
What about the Second Great Migration (African American) and/or the New Great Migration? I have no idea whether the online sources in the first article, or the offline books, would cover Meridian's involvement in particular but it would be something to talk about (making hand gestures drawing hands away from each other).... doncram (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the more likely explanation is White flight, though I haven't found any sources yet. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This pdf could possibly have some information from the 70s and 80s, but it's mostly about the revitalization of the city. Regardless, it has a lot of useful information and may need to be included. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 07:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC) (Information proved to be less important/useful than I had thought)[reply]
  • Possibly find a list of past Meridian mayors for the Government section. Some further expansion of the section is also needed.
Haha well it's not much, but as this site is expanded by the owner (who last updated the database in March 2009, so it appears as if he's at least semi-active), the list on the page will hopefully grow. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 09:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If anyone can find some historical demographics data, that would be useful for the Demographics section to give an example of the effects of the changing economy on the population. Possibly from the 1980 and 90 census? Or censuses before then?
This pdf has some information about per capita income. I'll add it later, but this is a note to remind me. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 07:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC) (Information was about Lauderdale County, not Meridian)[reply]
This page has some old demographic data, but it's in graph form with no numbers. I wonder if I could contact the webmaster or something to find out real numbers? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This pdf contains a historical study of the city including total population, racial demographics, and some other factors. This is exactly what I was looking for. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
  • The Geography section could probably include some more information. Examples of what to add can be found in the Featured Articles list mentioned above.
 Done
  • I'd like to include a little more in the Economy section such as hard figures from the city's annual economic report and more detailed information on the businesses, revenues, etc. in the city.
 Done
  • If someone could find/make a map of the interstate, U.S., and State highways in the city, that would be pretty awesome for the Highways section.
 Done
  • Major expansion of the Education section is needed. As of now, it consists of two simple paragraphs. Perhaps some historic data about the beginnings of education in the city? Awards, nominations, merits, etc. of local schools? Average levels of education for citizens?
 Done, though some more information couldn't hurt.
  • The Media and Publishing section needs some actual text instead of just tables. Perhaps some historical aspects of The Meridian Star (when it was founded, who it serves, where it's located, etc.)? I think the AM/FM and TV stations list should be shortened to include only the major stations and be converted to paragraph form.
 Done

These are my suggestions, and, like I said, I'll be working on these in the near future, so if anyone wants to join and help, that would be appreciated. Thanks! --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a good plan, well informed by the peer review and your reviewing other FAs or GAs. I wonder, what about taking a printout of this list a printout and of the article to the central library reference desk, and directly asking for help. I imagine that a librarian or two could tackle item #4 above, and help in other ways. Anyhow, good luck! doncram (talk) 21:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very impressive plan. Are you going to put it through a Good Article review first? I've been out of town, but should be able to help with some material now. Doncram's suggestion of using local sources is s good one - it may be harder to find material you're looking for on the Internet. I can only research online; am not local. --Parkwells (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I thought I would wait until all this is finished to put it up for GA; IMO, it's not ready yet. If all of these things are finished, then the good article review won't take as long and it would provide more specific information instead of these broad suggestions. If it passes as a GA, I plan on immediately putting it up for FA. I'll try to go to the local library sometime, but I'm going to get as much off the internet as I can. I'm not really a fan of using books for references; I'd like anyone that visits the page to be able to see exactly what I'm seeing. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just created History of Meridian, Mississippi. I copied the info from this article's History section and will work on shortening this section. Any expansion to the history of the city should be done there. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just spent a few hours working on the article and created a new Culture section. I incorporated many of the places of interest into this new section and also added a few to the economy section. I plan to expand the Culture section a bit with some famous people (artists, singers, etc.) later. I'm eventually working toward making this a FA, so we'll see how that goes! :)--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not too pleased about the removal of Different Seasons, aka Crossroads, gay bar and its featuring in a Kevin Smith film, Small Town Gay Bar. And I don't see where it's been moved to any related article. I think it should stay in the main article to at least give some balance to the demographics and culture of the city.. the Queen city even.

This content was removed: Different Seasons[1], formerly known as Crossroads, is one of the gay bars featured in the Kevin Smith (executive producer)/Malcolm Ingram (director) film Small Town Gay Bar and one of only 6 gay bars in Mississippi.[1]

  1. ^ "Mississippi - USA Gay Bars". Ambush Online. Retrieved 2008-06-09.

- ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 03:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dangit, I figured I'd slip that by you haha (not trying to be rude). I'm not saying I don't want it to be in the article; I just couldn't find anywhere to put it with the new organization. I think, like the Mississippi article, there should be some research done on the demographics section of the city (which currently has an expand tag), and an LGBT section (or whatever name consensus comes up with) can be added there.. along with African-Americans, Jews, and whatever other groups have greatly influenced the city.
Btw, I don't even think Crossroads/Different Seasons is open anymore.. Their website says "Crossroads closed but the web page remains. Enjoy." Technically, if it's not open, it shouldn't really be listed as a site of interest in the city. Maybe it could be included in a history of LGBT in the city? Like if something like Equality Mississippi was formed in Meridian that could be included, or if there was some rally or protest or something. I don't really know of anything in particular off the top of my head in the city, but since you're more versed in the subject, maybe you could contribute?
If you can come up with at least a few sentences on the history of LGBT, it can be included in the demographics section, but I feel like you're going to be hard-pressed to find anything more than the info about Different Seasons. I know there's one gay bar here now named Club Options.. but other than the fact that a few small bars have opened, gone bankrupt (or closed for whatever reason), and another opened in its place, there's just not really that much to talk about. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The film itself can be cited as a source as it contains a wealth of information. It covers the history of Crossroads and it touches on how gay people in such a conservative state have to go to such great lengths to meet and "be free". There's also a wonderful book by a Dr. John Howard (of Brandon, MS, now a professor at a university in London) that covers Mississippi gay history from the 1930s on up until the late 1980s (including a section of former Gov. Bill Allain and his trysts with transgender hookers). The book is called Men Like That: A Southern Queer History (Not sure why he didn't call it A Mississippi Queer History since that's all it's about). Maybe not so much to straight Mississippi, but Crossroads, later called Different Seasons, is a legend and monument in Mississippi LGBT history. - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 04:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I see.. I didn't know the bar was that important. Regardless, it's not open anymore, so I think that should be specified when it's included in the article. It's good that a movie like this was made that is so apparently informative. If you can come up with a small draft of Meridian's LGBT history based on that movie (and ideally a few more sources), it can be added. Idk about that book, though.. it seems as if it covers the state as a whole. I didn't look at the book or anything, but if there's nothing specifically about Meridian, I can't see it being justified. If you can pull some stuff out related to the city, though, I'm all for it.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see what I can get together. I've got to find my copies... of the movie and the book as much of that stuff is still boxed up from my house burning down March 2008. May take some time but that shouldn't be an issue as I'm sure you're in no hurry for this specific content. lol - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 04:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Robert Smith[edit]

I just updated the article for the new mayor, Cheri M. Barry. There was some information in the "Government" section about John Robert Smith, the former mayor, so I commented it out. This information is reliably sourced and notable (I guess?), so I don't think it should be removed from Wikipedia, but where should it go? There isn't enough information about him to start his own article, but he's no longer the mayor of this city! Haha anyone have any ideas? The commented out information is below:

The current mayor, John Robert Smith (R), has been in office since 1993 and has been recognized as an arts leader throughout the city and state,[1] working on projects such as the restoration of Meridian's Grand Opera House, the future Mississippi Arts & Entertainment Center, upkeep and improvement of Bonita Lakes Park, the building of Bonita Lakes Mall, and development and construction of the Union Station multi-modal transportation center.[2] He is also co-chairman of the National Forum on the Future of Passenger Rail, a member of Amtrak's board of directors, and a member of the transportation committees of the National League of Cities and the U.S. Conference of Mayors.[3]
  1. ^ "Mayor John Robert Smith Awards for Art Achievement". Americans for the Arts. 2008-03-12. Retrieved 2008-06-17.
  2. ^ "Meridian, MS Mayoral Accomplishments". Official Website of Meridian, MeridianMS.org. Retrieved 2008-06-17. (This link is dead now; the city has removed Smith's info and will soon replace it with Barry's.)
  3. ^ "Reconnecting America - Board of Directors". Reconnecting America. Retrieved 2008-06-17.

--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page has now been updated with Barry's biography (or at least some of it), but I don't really find any of it noteworthy. It sounds more like a college application than a list of accomplishments. Still no one has any ideas about what to do with JRS's info? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 06:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given his length of time in office, perhaps you could use Smith's accomplishments as a way of discussing new city directions during that time: emphasis on redevelopment, including Union Station as multi-modal center, intergovernmental and private collaboration, renovation of parks and infrastructure, encouraging redevelopment of historic buildings, etc. His membership on groups also tells you what directions city leaders in many areas were taking for redevelopment after the suburbs had drawn off businesses from downtowns. He looked outward to get ideas and build support.Parkwells (talk) 15:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meridian, Mississippi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer preliminary comments[edit]

These are some initial comments, based on one reading of the article.

  • The article is clearly written, except for a few sentences. WP:USCITY recommends writing the Media section and the Notable natives and residents section as prose, rather than using lists as this article does. The Featured Article Minneapolis and its subsidiary articles Media in Minneapolis-St. Paul and List of Minneapolitans show a good way to do this.
  • The article appears to be factually accurate and based on reliable sources. On the other hand, there are three sections that are not sourced at all: highways, the radio/TV listings and the Notable Meridianites.
  • The article's breadth of coverage is good. WP:USCITY gives a guidelines for writing articles about cities, and this article follows it to some extent. Several topics recommended for coverage in the guideline seem not to be covered here, or covered very briefly: sport teams, utilities, health care, annual cultural events. There is some coverage of parks, but it seems to be tied to recreation; are there any "plain old parks" that are big grassy areas for relaxation; are there any specialized parks such as botanical gardens or zoos?
  • The article is written from a neutral point of view.
  • The article is stable.
  • The images all have free licenses, are relevant to the topic, and (with two exceptions) have suitable captions. The exceptions are: (1) The infobox picture has no caption; (2) The MSU Riley Center is captioned with its old name, Grand Opera House

Since the structure and coverage are good, I will review each section separately and post my comments here over a period of several days. Then I'll decide which are the must-fix items for GA status. --Uncia (talk) 01:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer detailed comments and editor responses[edit]

Lede[edit]

The lede (or lead) should be a very condensed version of the whole article. It is also an enticement for people to read the whole article, so it should concentrate on the most interesting aspects of the city and omit or treat lightly the more routine parts. You don't have to mention that Meridian has a government, or schools, or media, because every town has those. The article does not have to present information in the same order the article does. You only get 4 paragraphs, so you have to be very selective in the detail presented, and somewhat selective in the choice of topics. There is a great deal of general advice at WP:LEDE.

Things I would mention in the lede:

  • location, county seat, population
  • a little on early history, and importance during most of its history as a railroad town and transportation hub
  • Mention the Goodman-Chaney-Schwerner case; this is a famous case, and although the murders did not occur here, the workers were based here, and Chaney was a native
  • current economy and important sources of income (this appears to be retail trade from the surrounding area, but you need to beef up this part of the Economy section)
  • access to the city: major highways, rail, air
  • government institutions located here, such as the two colleges, two military bases, and the drug training center
  • mention a few of the more notable tourist attractions
  • mention anything that makes Meridian unique or unusual; this might include:
  • Peavey - this is a famous brand, and few people know it is based in Meridian
  • the black Carnegie library
  • a short list of really famous Meridianites that people would have heard of; this might include Jimmie Rodgers, Diane Ladd, Sela Ward

You don't have to put the info in this order; pick an order that makes the narrative flow smoothly. A stylistic note: statements in the lede normally do not have to be footnoted, if the information is repeated in the body and footnoted there. Omitting the footnotes makes it read more smoothly.

The lede is the hardest part to write, and should be the easiest part to read. It should be written last because it will summarize the rest of the article. You can keep a lot of the present lede, but it has more on history than you can afford in 4 paragraphs. Some specific comments on the current lede:

  • How "historic" is the Amtrak station? The article says it was built in 1997.
  • The infobox picture needs a caption
  • Is the city really struggling economically? The cites for this are 30 years old
  • "Since the 1950s, the city's population has been declining" - not according to the census table under Demographics
  • Are MainStreet Meridian and Vision 2003 still in business? Don't mention them here if they are not.
  • infobox: says city was founded in 1854, but this is not in the body; body implies it was founded in 1853, but doesn't say this explicitly

--Uncia (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

There are a number of statements that are probably true but are not supported by the references; I have marked these as "citation needed". There's one item that appears to be a direct quote, "provide luxury to the common man", that I have marked as "cite this quote".

I have made a number of small improvements in the text; please check these.

Specific comments
  • "Originally inhabited by the Choctaw" - "Originally" is probably the wrong word here; I think this passage means that the Choctaw were here when the white men showed up; we may not know who lived here before the Choctaw.
 Done. I changed it to "previously"; sound better?
  • "Meridian was purchased by the United States" - the article Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek says it was a land swap, not a purchase. Which is correct? The cited source does not support either story, so we need a cite for this too.
 Done. To avoid needing more sourcing, I changed the phrase to "Meridian was obtained by the United States"; there's no doubt about that.
  • How did Richard McLemore come to own the land? It must have belonged to the US Government immediately after the purchase or swap; did he get a government grant of some sort? How much did he own?
Yes, he did get a land grant, but I'll have to find a source that says this.
 Done. I found a source that says he got a land grant of about 2000 acres; unfortunately it's an offline source from the National Park Service. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sowashee, Ragsdale City, Meridian should not be bolded, see WP:BOLDFACE
 Done
  • History of Meridian Mississippi seems to be mis-cited: There's no mention of Don E. Wright in the source; in the source it is attributed to Rowland, Dunbar, LL.D. and dated 1907, not the 2004 date given in the cite.
I have no clue where Don E. Wright came from, but the 2004 date I got from when the page was last edited, which can be seen at the top. I'm sure I should use Dunbar Rowland, but should I use a date of 1907 or leave it as 2004?
  • The Meridian naming story doesn't make sense chronologically, because it says (1) the town was incorporated as Meridian in 1860; (2) the name was chosen when the Southern Railway reached Meridian, which according to the Nussbaum reference was in 1861.
Well, Meridian was incorporated in 1860; I know that for a fact. The Nussbaum reference simply states that the name of the station (not the city) was changed to "Meridian" from "Sowashee" in 1861, and I believe I misread this when I was originally writing this. I've clarified the story now.
 Done. I updated the naming story substantially with a new book I found written in 1938. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • What's the origin of the name Meridian? It doesn't lie on a meridian.
Honestly I can't find any source for why they chose Meridian.. only that they chose it. I (being a resident of the city) have been told before that the name was thought to be a Native American word (maybe pertaining to the Sowashee creek? I can't remember), but the people who transliterated it made a mistake, so it doesn't actually mean what it was thought to mean haha. I'll keep looking for sources.
 Done. Found a source. Apparently people in the early city though "meridian" (meaning the longitudinal line) was synonymous with "junction," so I was right that it was a mistake, but it wasn't a Native American word. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sherman "destroying the railroads" - can we be more specific here? For the most part Union troops in the war tore up railroad tracks, but there's much to to a operating railroad than the tracks.
All the sources say "destroy[ing] the railroads" and nothing more.. I'm not sure what exactly happened, but I know they were repaired in 26 working days, so it couldn't have been that devastating, could it?
Found a source and added, "Among the damage was the destruction of an arsenal, immense storehouses, and the railroad in every direction."(William T. Sherman (January 21, 1875). "Memoirs of General W.T. Sherman – Meridian Campaign". St. Louis, Missouri. Retrieved 2010-06-02.). --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 03:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • common English words such as General, manufacturing, railroad should not be wikilinked
 Done
  • "Industry profits helped finance the construction of most of the city's major buildings" - this is not stated in the cited reference
 Done. Removed.
  • "the Grand Opera House in 1890, the Wechsler School in 1894, two Carnegie libraries in 1913, and the Threefoot Building, Meridian's tallest skyscraper, in 1929" - these dates are not stated in the cited reference
 Done. I added references with all of these dates. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The city continued to grow thanks to a commission government" - as written, this attributes the growth to the form of government, which seems unlikely to be true
 Done
  • "90 new industries in 1913" - probably this means 90 new industrial businesses, not that 90 previously-unrepresented industries moved in. Also, did all 90 arrive in the same year? That's an amazing amount of economic development.
The source, which I obtained from the National Park Service, says "industrial plants," so I've changed it. And yes... Meridian was booming at the time haha.. wish it were that awesome now :P.
This book also says 90 plants. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The population has since continued to decrease as the city has struggled to create a modern economy based on newer industries." Three points: (1) according to the population figures under Demographics, the population goes up and down; it is not as steady a decline as this statement implies; (2) The cited reference does not say that the city has struggled to create a modern economy; (3) The cited source is from 1979, so it can't tell us what's happened in the past 30 years; is the city still struggling? Probably so, but we need a source for that.
 Done. I just removed the claim. The information I added about the city in the 1960s and 70s makes up for this claim, so it's not needed any more. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I recommend moving the last two paragraphs before the Historic Districts to Economy, since they deal with economic development and are not really history, being only a few years old.
I'm not sure what the last two paragraphs were at the time you wrote this, but now I believe the history section has a great flow all the way from the 1830 settling up to present day. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Mainstreet Meridian still alive? The referenced web page still exists but it only talks about Union Station and doesn't say anything about MainStreet.
 Done. Updated information about organizations and their efforts.
  • "Mainstreet Meridian, along with The Riley Foundation, helped renovate the historic Grand Opera House in 2006 into the "Mississippi State University Riley Center for Education and the Performing Arts." A 6-story parking garage, built to provide parking for the future Riley Center, opened in 2005. Plans are now underway to renovate the Threefoot Building into an upscale hotel before the end of 2009." The references given say that these things were planned to happen. Can you get references that said they actually happened on the dates indicated? Also, the reference for the Threefoot Building was written before construction began and does not state a completion date; is there a more recent reference for this one?
 Done
  • "Meridian contains nine historic districts listed on the National Register of Historic Places, illustrating the city's rich history." Unclear - does the fact that these are listed illustrate the city's rich history, or do the contents of the districts illustrate it? And is there a source for this claim?
 Done. I removed the claim all together.
  • Late Victorian and Bungalow are given as styles but they are not in the references. Also, is Bungalow really a style? It is wikilinked to Bungalow which is a type of building, not a style of building.

--Uncia (talk) 22:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "nris" reference includes "Late Victorian" and "Bungalow" as styles. This is actually a somewhat misleading reference that has caused some trouble with Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. The wikiproject uses a tool created by User:Elkman (found here) to query the NRHP database for information about specific properties or districts. I don't really know how to attribute this source (and neither does anyone else). This has been brought up at the project page numerous times, but there seems to be no sufficient answer; maybe you would like to bring it up over there?
In case you didn't check a diff, I answered many questions up there and asked a few more. I invite you to look over the entire section.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I noticed that there is no mention of the March 2, 1906 tornado that killed several people and did extensive damage to downtown Meridian. There is no mention of it in the main article: History_of_Meridian,_Mississippi either. There are newspaper reports that exist on the subject, and photos taken during aftermath of the disaster that exist as well. I kindly suggest that this event be recorded in both articles. In my opinion, it is certainly worthy of inclusion. -- Bully84 (talk) 07:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Government[edit]

This section is basically OK. WP:USCITY recommends "Secondly, a brief paragraph about finance: spending for a recent year and/or proposed spending with footnotes to the full reports. The method of taxation: sales tax/real estate/personal property. The total number of government employees could be listed." This is useful to show how big an operation the government is, and how stable its income stream is, in up and down times. The present article says that Meridian is struggling economically; if the government is doing anything innovative (beyond the usual penny-pinching) to preserve and protect its income stream, that's worth mentioning here. --Uncia (talk) 15:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics[edit]

This section has a lot of good information, but it is all jumbled together and mixed in with some non-factual speculation. I suggest this be reorganized and grouped as:

  • current (2000) Census Bureau statistics on population, housing, and ethnicity;
  • fluctuation of population, including reasons for this if known (much of this might be better covered under Economy)
  • shift to a black-majority city; this needs to be documented carefully, with numbers, percentages and years and eliminating unsourced speculation. Part of the data is for "non-white" rather than black, and this needs to be distinguished carefully.

The last two items are important stories and help make this an interesting article.

Population figures are frequently vandalized on Wikipedia and need to be sourced and checked carefully. Also consider omitting the less-important measurements.

Meridian seems to have a lot more economic activity than would be expected from a city its size. Is there a much larger population in the immediate area? Is Meridian a business hub, or retail or manufacturing center? If so this should be discussed under Economy, but here you can mention the size and geographical extent of a larger community it is drawing upon. You can talk about the Meridian micropolitan area here.

I added info about the micropolitan area as well as some figures for population in a 45/65 mi radius from the EMBDC's website. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 00:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Specific comments
  • "Between 1980 and 2000, the population declined over 16%": that is what it says in the reference (p. 32), but they calculated it wrong. The 1980 population was 46,577, the 2000 population was 39,968, so the 2000 population was 39,968/46,577 = 85.81% of the 1980 population, or a 14.19% drop. The source calculated it with a base of year 2000 instead of year 1980.
So should I go with the source, or would this explanation be WP:OR?
 Done. I removed the claim.
  • The unemployment and CPI figures need to be dated more precisely; this data is usually issued monthly, not annually, and varies a lot from month to month. Also, the 7.1% increase is more than 2 percentage points (not 2%) above the national increase. Also, this information probably should be moved to Economy.
I just removed the information.

--Uncia (talk) 15:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about adding a "Religion" section here. So I don't clutter up my bookmarks on my browser, this mostly a mental note to incorporate the following pages: [2] [3] and [4] (although this third one is about Lauderdale County and not just the city). --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Religion section now added.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 00:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and climate[edit]

This is OK overall. WP:USCITY includes human-made features as part of Geography, including skyline and neighborhoods. So the article might mention the Threefoot Building here as the tallest building, and any other especially tall or attention-getting buildings. Is there an "old town" and a "new town", or is the oldest part just in the core of the city? Are the black people concentrated in one part of the city? There's an African American Historic Business District; is there anything especially notable about it?

Specific comments
  • The distances to other cities appear to be driving distances rather than as-the-crow-flies distances, and this should be noted.
 Done
  • This section is overlinked. Do not not link common English words such as oak, pine, tornado.
 Done
  • Since we have a nice table of temperatures and precipitations, I think we could omit the narrative for those things. If the narrative is to be kept, it probably should reference the same data source as the table to avoid inconsistencies.

--Uncia (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The narrative only points out high and low temperatures as well as average precipitation, things that can be gathered from analyzing data in the chart, but the narrative makes this information more straightforward IMO. The reason they have different sources is the averages are only in the idcide source and not the weather channel. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Economy[edit]

The economic picture probably includes a lot of things that are near, but not in, the city. It's OK to include these and speak about "Meridian area" activities, but if the article says something is "in Meridian", it should be inside the city limits. This may not be that important to customers or employees, but it is important to the city's tax base and how future growth is managed.

I've reworded some of this material to clear things up.

From the data here it appears that Meridian draws retail customers from a much wider area than the city itself: A city of 40,000 with a per capita income of $15,000 could not possibly generate $2 billion a year in retail. Some of the shopping centers claim the area has a market of from 1/4 to 1/2 million people, which is probably an exaggeration, but there must be a lot more than 40,000 people shopping here. See what you can dig up about this. Also, do many people commute from outside the city to work?

Can't really find anything about this.. I'll keep looking though.
This site states that there are 232,900 people in a 45 mile radius and 526,500 in a 65 mile radius. Maybe that's where the 1/4 to 1/2 million figure comes from? Should I include the data on this page? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the table in the section to reflect the employment data given here. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The data in the Industries table is very old (it's from 2002) and imprecise in some spots (Administrative and support is given as 1000–2499, an uncertainty that is larger that most of the other classes). I suggest you try to get some better data, or omit this altogether. The Mississippi Department of Employment Security has very detailed employment data. The current table seems not to include government employment, which is a significant part of Meridian's labor force.

I agree that the information is too old and imprecise, but I was unable to find anything better. The MDES only has information specific to industry about Lauderdale County and not the city itself; would this still be ok to include? Here are some examples: [5] [6] [7].
I also found employment information (though it appears to be undated?) here. What are your thoughts? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've begun adding this data. I'll see if I can work in the MDES information. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia generally does not speculate on future events; see WP:CRYSTAL. Projections about future economic growth should not be included, unless there is very strong evidence that they will come true.

 Done. These claims were removed.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very specific data quickly goes out of date, for example, the statement that retail has "378 institutions employing 4,892 people" is almost certainly not correct today. If you want to report to this level, also give the date when the data was valid; in this example it would be "As of 2002, ...".

 Done

Similarly, lists of particular stores in shopping malls tend to go out of date. And, as all large shopping malls tend to contain the same national chain stores, it's not that informative to give evidence that this is also true in Meridian. A short list of the anchor tenants or other notable stores can be useful to indicate the character of the mall. For example, there are not that many FAO Schwarz or Neiman Marcus stores, and if a mall has one, that is worth mentioning.

I shortened the list, but there aren't really any super-unique stores in the center. It's a basic shopping center with these stores. Mind you, the stores I originally included were by no means all of the stores in the shopping center – just the biggest ones. There are many other smaller stores in the center.
I just removed the list entirely.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Specific comments
  • This section is over-linked; common English words such as train and cotton should not be linked.
 Done
  • A number of wikilinks go to the wrong article; these include Department of Homeland Security (goes to the national office, not the state one); Structural steel does not link to the company; support links to a disambiguation page; war on drugs is correct but overly-broad, as it covers a lot of policy work too and does not depend on innovations in law enforcement
The DHS link was intended to go to the national office to describe what a department of homeland security is.. The DHS in question is actually a local DHS, so there is no article about it. It's mentioned in the Government section of the article.
  • "The city is also home to two military facilities, Naval Air Station Meridian and Key Field, which supply more than 4,000 jobs to the city's residents." - the video says the NAS and National Guard at Key Field (not Key Field in general) account for more than 4,000 jobs, but doesn't say they all go to city residents.
 Done. I reworded the claim.
  • NAS Meridian and Key Field are near but not in the city

--Uncia (talk) 21:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NAS Meridian may not be in the city limits (I'd have to check on some maps), but Key Field definitely is... I live right beside it haha. Regardless, I've reworded the information to say the city "is served" by the two, which doesn't require them to be in the city limits. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Culture[edit]

This is a good description of the art and recreation situation in the city, but it needs a lot more sources. Some statements copied from existing sources are not very clear. Most of the sources are from the thing being described (they are not third-party sources) and in some instances some unwarranted bragging (WP:PEACOCK) has slipped in. I have flagged most or all of these problem statements.

In WP:USCITY recreation is discussed under Parks and recreation rather than under Culture.

Specific comments
  • this section is over-linked. Common English words such as photography and sculpture should not be linked.
 Done
  • The Hamasa Shrine Temple Theater needs more detailed citations. Currently it has only one, to the front page of its web site. Probably the sources for these statements are on the web site somewhere, but each statement needs to be tied to a specific page. I've also flagged a dubious and probably unverifiable statement that the pipe organ is "equivalent" to a 100-piece symphony orchestra.
 Done
  • "the Carnegie library at 25th Ave and 7th St was closed" - looking at the map, it appears that the old library and the new library are both at 25th Avenue and 7th Street (on opposite corners), so this description may be confusing. How about giving the street address instead?
The old library was a Carnegie library; the new one is not. By saying "the Carnegie library," I am in fact referring to the old one.
  • "official arts agency" - explain here what "official" means (it's in the reference). "Official" can mean a lot of things, including a purely honorary designation, but here it means they control some money, which is important.
I'm not sure how to do that based on the source. Little help?
  • "Around Town Carousels Abound is a public arts project of 62 carousel horses, representing the historic carousel. Sixty-two pieces have been sponsored by local businesses and citizens, and design of the horses was conceived and painted by local artists. They are placed throughout the city and county." This section is confusing, partly because it runs two verbs together (abound is), partly because its connection to the carousel is not mentioned until fairly late, and partly because because it is based on a vague source. I'm not sure how to fix all this; try to get a better source (there's probably some press coverage of the project), and maybe rearrange the order of items. Possibly it should be moved to the Arts section, as it seems to have more to do with art than with parks.
 Done
  • "railroad equipment from the steam-engine era" - should this be "steam locomotive era"?

--Uncia (talk) 19:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added some more about arts (such as the MAEC and it's Walk of Fame and the Meridian Symphony Orchestra) as well as moved some information from the Recreation section. I rearranged the arts section for a better narrative, so I'd like your thoughts on the new layout. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transportation[edit]

This could be improved with some narrative; it is now a set of lists, not much different than you would get by looking at maps and timetables. Some questions that spring to mind:

  • Considering the historic importance of the railroad to Meridian, does the present-day railroad only deserve one sentence? Is there any rail freight, or is it only passenger travel?
The present-day railroad has an entire paragraph devoted to it.
  • There is no description of the Meridian Transit System; the article doesn't even say what it is. My guess is that it accounts for nearly all of the 242,360 passengers per year.
I was unaware an article had been created (though it's crappy at best) about the Meridian Transit System, but I just linked to it. There's not really much information out there.. nothing of worth on their official site, and these two articles[8][9] are really the only thing talking about the system. If you can fashion something about the system from these sources, by all means be my guest.
  • Is Atlanta really the only place you can fly from the airport? That seems like a waste of the state's longest public runway. Who provides the commercial air service? Does it get the Essential Air Service subsidy? Do the two military installations also use the field? Maybe they are the ones who need the long runway.
Yes, Atlanta is the only place you can fly. Yes, it is a waste. Military installations do use the field, but I'll have to find some good sources for this.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 22:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is Meridian still a major transportation hub? Is the transportation now by truck rather than train?

--Uncia (talk) 22:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Education[edit]

This is good, except for a discrepancy in the number of schools in the public school system between what is written here and what the reference says. --Uncia (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I updated the sources for the number of public schools and also added a source for private schools in the city. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Media[edit]

The newspaper section is basically OK; I've flagged some spots that need improvements.

The TV and radio sections have a number of problems, including:

  • not sourced
  • unclear whether these are the stations that are received in Meridian, or that broadcast in Meridian
  • W47CG is a repeater and probably should not be listed; whatever it is repeating should be listed instead

WP:USCITY cautions that "It's very easy to make this article a list of radio/TV stations, movies, TV shows, etc. This should be avoided, instead constructing the information as prose."

The subject of concentration of media ownership is a important one. Is the newspaper locally owned? Are the TV and radio stations locally owned, and are there a few companies that own them all?

Are there any alternative publications, such as (possibly free) art newspapers? Is there a community access TV channel? Is there an NPR outlet? Are there any nonprofit stations? --Uncia (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page shows all TV signals broadcasting from Meridian, but the info is unreadable to me haha. Could you perhaps fashion something out of this? Here is the AM and FM links as well. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Meridianites[edit]

WP:USCITY says in part, "Provide information, preferably in prose form, of any famous or notable individuals that were born in, or have lived for a significant amount of time, in the city. A bulleted list is usually acceptable in the early stages of an article's development, but such lists are frequently vandalized, and the higher level review processes (WP:GA and WP:FA), prefer that this section be written out as prose."

See List of Minneapolitans for an example of a good treatment. Notice that the people are discussed in groups by occupation, and that in most cases the connection to Minneapolis is given and a reference is given.

Since all of the people currently listed here have their own Wikipedia articles, in theory you should be able to get the connections and the references from those articles. I did a brief spot check, but it wasn't very encouraging on the references: most did not give sources for their claims. One article, LisaRaye McCoy doesn't even mention Meridian. --Uncia (talk) 04:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer's assessement and list of must-fix items[edit]

This article has much good information and is generally well-written, but does not yet meet the good article criteria. Don't be dismayed by the large number of reviewer comments; most of these are easy to fix, and many are not sufficiently serious to prevent promotion to GA status.

The article passes good article criteria 3–6 with no problem. It almost passes criterion 1 (Well-written), except for a few ambiguous or contradictory statements. It is not too far from passing criterion 2 (Factually accurate and verifiable); there is quite a lot of unsourced material here, and a moderate amount that is not from third-part sources, but the good article criteria only requires citations for specific types of claims, and not for all claims.

Here's what I would like you to fix before I pass the article. Everything is negotiable, so let me know if you would like some changes in the list. I'll give you until September 15 to fix these; this also is negotiable, and somewhat arbitrary.

  • Fix all the statements that are marked as unclear, wrong word, should be, doesn't make sense, discrepancy, and similar words. In some cases this just requires rearranging the sentence, but in others the statement is ambiguous and you need to go back to the source to get the correct interpretation
  • Fix all statements that are marked as contradictory
  • Fix all statements that are marked as not being supported by the reference
  • These discussions need to be sourced carefully:
  • Meridian's economic decline (if you decide it is declining)
  • Wikipedia has especially strict rules for information about living persons (WP:BLP), including strict rules for sourcing. Most of the people in Notable Meridianites are living, so their inclusion here needs to be sourced. If you cannot find a high-quality source for a living person's connection to Meridian, take the person out of the list.
  • Describe briefly the Meridian Transit System
  • Rewrite the lede as discussed in the reviewer comments

Good work so far! I hope you will go beyond these GA requirements and fix more of the article, as many of the fixes are not that hard and they will improve the article greatly. Leave a note here if you have questions or want to negotiate the must-fix items or the deadline. --Uncia (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meridian, Mississippi/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 17:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will begin reviewing this article and make straightforward changes as I go (explanations in edit summaries). Please revert any changes I make where I inadvertently change the meaning. I will post queries below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 17:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

its historic Union Station now provides several other modes of transportation including... --> "its historic Union Station now houses several other modes of transportation including" ?
I changed it to "the historic Union Station is now also home to several other modes of transportation, including..."--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The city is served by the East Mississippi Business Development Corporation. - not sure why this needs to e in the lead.
I had it in there originally because the EMBDC is the main economic organization in the city. I've removed it though, since I couldn't really find anywhere for it to fit in the lead.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In 2000, 2094 crimes were reported - should it be 2009?
The source says: "During 2000, the latest full year for which Uniform Crime Report statistics are available from the FBI, crime in Meridian rose a tiny 3/10 of one percent, from 2,008 crimes reported to 2,094." I've looked for updated sources but can find none; if you can find some more recent numbers, by all means add them. Also, the sentence before that states the number of cases in 2009 that the CID responded to.. I don't think the CID and the police department are the same entity, however.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
okay, thanks for double-checking. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With a daily circulation[year needed] of over 16,000 - yeah, needs fixing.
I can find tons of sources giving a circulation figure for the newspaper, but none of them list a year (they also all give different numbers haha). Do you know of a location I could look to find dated circulations?--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. I am in Australia so the area is little known to me. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I found a source with some help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any material which can be added to the Geography and climate on nature reserves or national parks nearby? Are there any or is it all farmland?
The closest national park/forest is Bienville National Forest around Forest, Mississippi, which is about 45 miles west of the city. Clarkco State Park is also south of the city in Quitman, Mississippi. Okatibee Lake (in the Recreation section) is just north of the city, and Bonita Lakes is a manmade reservoir on the southeast end of the city, but other than those, there's not really much going on around the city haha. Should I add mentions of these four?--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 04:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'd add it all. I find it's good to give an idea of the surrounding countryside (especially if national forests are uncommon in mississippi). Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
While I think it's good to mention the surrounding countryside as well, I don't think the national forest and the state park warrant mention in this article. Neither of them are in (or really even close enough to be related to) the city, so why should they warrant inclusion here? I'll see what I can do with Bonita Lakes and Okatibee (even though the latter is located northwest of the city in Collinsville, it's closer and more related to the city than the others. It even shows up on the city's website). Both are mentioned in the Recreation section of the article, but they're not really described geographically (i.e. how big they are, where they are located, etc.) there or in any sources I can find, so it may take a while..--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - reasoning is sound. Go for it. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:24, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise looking good and nearing a pass. Very comprehensive! I should add the prose needed a little fine-tuning (as you probably guessed. You might find User:Tony1/How to improve your writing helpful. I certainly did. If you find yourself using a word in two or three successive sentences then it is a good idea to examine its use and maybe come up with some alternatives. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: - the more I think about it the above quibble I have about some environment stuff would be needed for FA but not GA. I do advise going for FAC, maybe after someone else looks over the prose. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

Convictions at federal courthouse[edit]

An article today in the NY Times noted that the 1967 conviction of the deputy sheriff in the federal trial for the civil rights murders was the first time a white jury had convicted a white official in civil rights killings. I added that to the article, as well as when the federal courthouse was built. The court function is going to be closed down, but the USPS also operates there.Parkwells (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]