Talk:Mereological essentialism

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Logic

I don´t agree that the remark about an increduolus stare at the defender of mereological essentialism is a overly biased sentence. The point is that ME is considered as a too absurd position, but if it has other theoretical benefits it should be defended. The situation is the same as with David Lewis´ defence of concrete possible worlds. The increduolus stare attitude is, for instance, defended, not explicitly, by Peter van Inwagen and Trenton Merricks. RickardV 10:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mereological essentialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626201136/http://marksteen.googlepages.com/BO_OO_and_ME.pdf to http://marksteen.googlepages.com/BO_OO_and_ME.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/49/16/Par.Increase.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]