Talk:Mercury sulfide

Wrong link to MSDS[edit]

The MSDS links to Mercury Oxide, which is the wrong chemical! The whole hazards sections seems to be wrong as well! Possibly the safety data for mercury oxide somehow got put on the mercury sulfide page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.242.3 (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mercury(I) sulfide[edit]

Does anyone have any information on mercury(I) sulfide? I found it mentioned briefly in a few papers on Google Scholar, but nothing in Greenwood & Earnshaw. If Hg₂S doesn't exist, this would be worth mentioning in the article.

Ben (talk) 01:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found this, looks reputable - gives Merck and the Rubber Bible as references.

If we can find some more detail (e.g. journal articles), mercury(I) compounds could make a nice article.

Ben (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Cinnabar article[edit]

It looks like this article is mostly redundant with the (much longer) cinnabar article. Does anyone see a good reason not to merge them (or just replacing this page with a redirect) ? Zombiejesus (talk) 03:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We usually keep minerals separate from chemicals, even if they have the same composition and structure. That this article is short is a matter of lacking manpower - too many chemicals to describe on wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 03:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense, though in that case I would think of this page as almost a stub. In any case I'll add a 'See Also' link to cinnabar. Thanks. Zombiejesus (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-toxic in Europe[edit]

please check-out the EU-classification: Xi, and the new one with GHS symbols

Safety data sheet[edit]

The link to the safety data sheet in the main template/sidebar on the right hand side is apparently out of date. It links to an oxide of mercury, not the sulfide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.167.103 (talk) 23:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]