Talk:Meme hack

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

You gotta article on Adbusters and all that. AtG has a posse/OBEY Giant. Reality hacking and yippies. The Merry whateverthey'recalled. Schwa.

This is notable on the same grounds... --207.216.10.77 17:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notable, but proposed merge[edit]

Unless someone cares to supply examples of 'meme hacks' used outside the realm of advertising and corporate identity, it is suggested that this be merged into a subsection on subvertising, and the relevant categories and stub tags be copied over. dr.ef.tymac 17:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that subvertising is more of a subsection of meme hacking than vice versa as subvertising uses meme hacking, whereas not all meme hacking needs to use or be subvertising. Haloquin 16:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems[edit]

The article doesn't cite external sources, & the alleged examples are just puzzling. There is no explanation of what makes Social Darwinism, Christian vegetarianism or the Muhammad cartoons a "meme hack". To stand as examples, these need reference to an external source identifying them as meme hacks. Otherwise they're just unsubstantiated OR. ωεαşεζǫįδ ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No reply after two weeks, so I've removed these confusing, unsourced, interpretive examples. ωεαşεζǫįδ ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meme hack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727235926/http://www.samizdata.net/blog/glossary_archives/002144.html to http://www.samizdata.net/blog/glossary_archives/002144.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]