Talk:Medveđa

I removed the following paragraph from the article. Somebody who knows more about the situation might want to incorporate parts of it, in neutral language. --Bonadea 08:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Medvegja Municipality was populated with the majority of the people Albanians until 1970. From that time the seerrbian goverment started a repression into the Albanian population so today we have only 208 albanians living there. Village merkonje it was populated with albanian peopleand for 30 years there are no albanians there. Serbia govermentdid an ethnic cleansisng in this village in the Ballkan wars and in 1945 after world war II finished his cleansing. There are to many villages that were popullated by albanian peoplethere like Svirce,Retkocer,Grbace, etc, and now we have Albanians only in the Sijarine, and Tupalle vilage.

Nothing to incorporate there. For example this map show that Serbs were majority in Medveđa municipality before 1970: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SFRYugoslaviaetno3.jpg So, we have here just unsourced and unproved statements. PANONIAN (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

adding albanian and common english name[edit]

hi, I would like to add in the albanian names of the locations, would that be a problem? thanks, mike James Michael DuPont 18:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Medveđa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medveđa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100716182644/http://www.medvedja.org.rs/ to http://www.medvedja.org.rs/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative name[edit]

@Crazydude1912: @Sadko: WP:PLACE: Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or that is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted. Local official names should be listed before other alternate names if they differ from a widely accepted English name. [..] Infoboxes should generally be headed with the article title, and include these alternate names. I don't think that this almost two-month dispute should continue about an area in which 1/5 of its citizens are Albanians.--Maleschreiber (talk) 06:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And? There is not a word about the official name, but alternative names in the lead and infobox. This is logical mistake. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 07:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We add alternative names not based on what is official or not (in this case Albanian is also official), but based on whether it is a relevant name (used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or by substantial group of people who live in the area). Albanian fits those criteria. There's no reason for such a small dispute to continue when policy overwhelmingly supports the inclusion of the alternative name in Albanian.--Maleschreiber (talk) 07:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see that part described in the quoted policy. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 07:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or that is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted. Local official names should be listed before other alternate names if they differ from a widely accepted English name. [..] Infoboxes should generally be headed with the article title, and include these alternate names.--Maleschreiber (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Kosovo uranium NATO bombing1999.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]