This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Strong oppose of proposed merge; completely different subjects with similar sounding names. -- Infrogmation 19:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose ditto. The concept of modern-day "Mayanism" is almost in direct opposition to what Mayanist scholarship entails- they should be separated with a ten-foot bargepole.--cjllwʘTALK 02:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Have now removed the merge tag, it's been a week or so and no comments in favour. --cjllwʘTALK 00:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Stephen Houston [born 1958] Holding a Phd. from Yale, Dr. Houston is an Epigrapher extraordinaire!"
The exclamation point is intended to express an opinion, which is inappropriate (with regard to value judgment) and silly. ExistentialAmbigram (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for bringing this to attention. That was part of a series of sometimes idiosyncratic and verbose descriptions added by an anon editor that IMO remained in the article too long. I have edited the descriptions. Infrogmation (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
