Talk:Max du Preez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Platform for libel[edit]

Is this supposed to be an objective biography? It looks more like an Italian ghetto on a dirty washing day. There is not a single positive assessment of this man. Even the Martin Flanagan quote is taken out of context. The article is a tragic indictment of what should be balanced journalism. For shame! Rotational (talk) 12:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. An entry that lists awards for fearless journalism and points out how the public mobilised in his support is obviously nothing but a platform for attack. 9Nak (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quite so Rotational (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have just read the copy of this discussion that was left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography.
If there is a problem with the article then be bold and fix it. If all the current sources reflect the subject in a negative light then dig out some sources that present him more positively. If there are any controversial statements that are not supported by reliable sources then remove them per the terms of the biographies of living persons policy. Regards. Road Wizard (talk) 01:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Listen people, just because there may have been a rather negative entry here, this is no reason to White wash this person now in the way done here. --41.151.81.130 (talk) 11:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deception[edit]

" During his tenure as editor, the newspaper's offices were bombed and Du Preez received death threats as a result of the paper's opposition to apartheid."

That statement is misleading. --41.150.78.154 (talk) 12:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Max du Preez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max du Preez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]