Talk:Maurice Delafosse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maurice Delafosse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Critism section may be necessary[edit]

I first came upon Delafosse's work when writing a thesis regarding the Serer people back in the 1990s, and I was shocked when I came upon Delafosse's work and falsehoods not supported by any credible scholar. In 2012, I was editing the Sundiata Keita (see my clean notes, and final edit [1]) when I came upon more of Delafosse's falsehoods and fabrication of West African genealogies and history. I wanted to find out what other credible authors said about his work especially relating to West African history and genealogies, as I've never taken him serious. As noted in my notes and edits all those years ago, which I see has been used in the Ghana Empire article, he was heavily criticised by historians as stated in my notes below:

Delafosse merely linked different legends (i.e. the Tautain story etc.) and prescribed Diara Kanté (1180) as the father of Soumaoro, in order to link the Sossos to the Diarisso Dynasty of Kaniaga (Jarisso). He also failed to give sources as to how he arrived to that conclusion and the genealogy he created. Monteil describes his work as "unacceptable". The African Studies Association describe it as "...too creative to be useful to historians". See:
  • African Studies Association, History in Africa, Volume 11, African Studies Association., 1984, the University of Michigan, pp 42-51
  • Monteil, Charles, Fin de siècle à Médine (1898-1899), Bulletin de l'lFAN, vol. 28, série B, n° 1-2, 1966, p 166
  • Monteil, Charles, La légende officielle de Soundiata, fondateur de l'empire manding, Bulletin du Comité d'Etudes historiques et scientifiques de l 'AOF, tome VIII, n° 2, 1924.
  • Robert Cornevin, Histoire de l'Afrique, Tome I : des origines au XVIe siècle (Paris, 1962), 347-48,(ref. to Delafosse in Haut-Sénégal-Niger vol.1, pp 256-257)
  • Crowder, Michael, West Africa: an introduction to its history, Longman, 1977, p 31 (based on Delafosse's work)
  • Delafosse, Maurice, Haut-Sénégal-Niger: Le Pays, les Peuples, les Langues; l'Histoire; les Civilizations. vols. 1-3, Paris: Émile Larose (1912), (editors: Marie François Joseph Clozel)

Since this man's work is being cited in many West African medieval history and genealogies which were based on his own psedo history, I believe a section showing critism of his work is necessary. Tamsier (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]