Talk:Matt Entenza

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism[edit]

There have been a number of edits recently by an anonymous user. These edits have change the article content slightly to support a position critical of Entenza. I feel that the content of the Star Tribune article linked to is accuratly summed up by the current edit. Inserting statements beyond what is in the cited story is outside the scope of this article and probably violates the NPOV policy. (User 70.57.147.253, you make a lot of edits. Why don't you create an account?) --Nscheibel 18:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, an anonymous user from 63.224.4.x has been removing all content relating to Entenza's withdrawal from the AG race. --Nscheibel 13:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geeze, call the Wikipedia police. Get over it

Do you have their number? 911 didn't seem to know. --Nscheibel 15:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Nscheibel. This article sucks as it is sooo unbalanced it clearly violates NPOV! I know this guy & IT DOES NOT PROPERLY REFLECT HIM AT ALL. I would think that if you are going to profile a LAWYER you should be careful what you write...and consequently Wikipedia should either fix it or pull it. Contrary to the assertion in the article about DFLers among his detractors...WE LOVE HIM!!!71.82.119.90 23:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I totally retract the paragraph directly above (yes, it was me) I was sooo seriously naive about the concept of honesty and how it relates to career politicians :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glindathegoodwitch (talk • contribs) 23:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Just about this entire article is muckraking. I'm all for muckraking but there's no balance here - one law credited to him and then into the dirt. I think there needs to be some balance; right now it's almost entirely scandals. I don't know the guy but on a casual visit, trying to learn about him, I was disappointed both in not finding much of what I need to know, and in the balance of this article. Given the remainder of this talk page I guess I shouldn't be surprised. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.172.23.24 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MattEn.jpg[edit]

Image:MattEn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be confused with Mike Erlandson[edit]

This article, and the Mike Erlandson article, each _NEED_ a "not to be confused with" banner across the top of each article. Please trust me, it's TOO easy to confuse Erlandson with Entenza, and any bad feelings towards one unfairly spills over to the other one. LP-mn (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that

Not to be confused with Mike Erlandson.

is the correct code to insert.

LP-mn (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Matt Entenza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Matt Entenza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Matt_Entenza&oldid=1201770393"