Talk:Mast Brothers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mast Brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

Reviewing this page, I am questioning if the criticism section holds enough weight to be mentioned in the introduction, or if this leans towards WP:UNDUE. I am starting this conversation in hopes of involving other editors before making any changes to the introduction. Jmbld (talk) 04:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will likely remove the criticism portion from the introduction unless anyone else feels strongly. Thank you. Jmbld (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to read more into that in order to weigh in here. Do you have some insight into the depth of the discussion Jmbld? Tec Tom (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't. However, after reviewing the sources in this section, they do pass WP:RS in my opinion. So perhaps a mention in the introduction is an appropriate summary of the company - thoughts? Jmbld (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]