Talk:Masatoshi Shima

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

  • I have changed the article because it was not giving Shima any real credit for the work he has done. It seems like Intel was giving most of the credit :(

Stanley Mazor

Mazor should be included in the group receiving credit for designing the 4004, because in the transcript (page 12) of the cited IEEE interview conducted by William Aspray on May 17, 1994, Masatoshi Shima states, "Stan Mazor’s role was quite important for finalizing the 4004 idea. He acted as a go-between Ted and Hoff and me. He assisted me when I wanted to explain my problem and ideas to Ted Hoff, also he interpreted Ted Hoff’s ideas for program examples to me and so on." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.40.19.216 (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Fagin, Hoff, Mazor, and Shima co-wrote a paper on The History of the 4004 in IEE Micro in 1996 (see http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=624049) and all four were jointly awarded the Kyoto Prize for Electronics in 1997. Chris Loosley (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Masatoshi Shima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]