Talk:Maryland campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modifications[edit]

I made some modifications to the recent large edits.

  • I have found nothing in my historical references that indicates Lee was motivated by the foreign recognition issue. In fact, he counseled Davis on occasion not to rely on an external intervention.
  • The sentence concerning "reaching Northern soil" discusses the lost order, which is covered in detail a couple of paragraphs down.
  • Lee's objective was not explicitly Pennsylvania; he had strong motivation to enter Maryland for purposes beyond simply getting to Pennsylvania.

Hal Jespersen 21:51, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whos campaign was this?[edit]

The intro makes this sound as if was Union plan: It consisted of a series of maneuvers and battles that culminated in the repulse of Confederate General Robert E. Lee's first invasion of the North. But I think this was the Southern plan to invade the North and capture Washintom. Maybe I just don't understand military terminoly.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 03:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

expansion[edit]

I have expanded the article's introductory material substantially and added a campaign map. The reason I mention it here is that a recent edit added a number of paragraphs regarding fierce resistance in Maryland, and Baltimore in particular. I left some of that in, but edited it significantly, because it was written in a florid style that is unencyclopedic. The larger problem is that I cannot substantiate the claims made in the paragraph that survives and I have annotated it with "citation needed." If anyone is interested in providing such a citation, please do so before June 23 or I will be forced to remove the material. Please use the style of footnotes that is used in the article. Hal Jespersen 20:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, I have removed the unsourced material and replaced it with Baltimore info from Sears. Hal Jespersen 21:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mile Hill[edit]

Hal, I noticed that someone created an article for the Battle of Mile Hill, a relatively insignificant cavalry engagement that often is considered as the first fight of the Maryland Campaign. It did open the way for Lee's occupation of Leesburg on September 4. Since the stub exists, perhaps you may want to add this battle to the template for the Maryland Campaign. Also, there were some larger cavalry actions during the campaign that have no articles (such as the fight at Quebec Schoolhouse near South Mountain, which I did as a wargaming scenario in my recent book on the Maryland Campaign). Scott Mingus 02:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the 'owner' of the campaign templates, so you are welcome to make changes. I'd do this one for you, but since you're considering other additions, why not do them as a group? And can you flesh them out in this Campaign article as you do? Thanks, Hal Jespersen 16:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore[edit]

removed the "baltimore was not a hotbed of secession" as it was unsourced. I have in my possesion a book by Daniel Carrol Toomey, Baltimore During the Civil War and it ontradicts the paragraph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nnoppinger (talk • contribs) 23:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is usually more polite to put in a {{fact|date=}} template request before ripping something out. I have restored the text and added a citation for the paragraph that did not already have one. (The earlier paragraph was already cited to James McPherson.) If the material you have contradicts these claims by two very prominent Civil War historians, you can add the appropriate information and citations. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath[edit]

Hi,

On the "aftermath" section, active campaigning continued several months after Antietam. Under McClellan and then Burnside the Union Forces conducted a fairly interesting operation in Northern Virginia that was essentially repeated a year later with Meades operations in northern Va culminating in the Bristoe/ Mine Run operations.

Shouldn't we add this "campaign" to wikipedia? 67th Tigers (talk) 18:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which sources would you cite?
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 19:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate chapter of McClellan's War by Ethan Rafuse would be an obvious starting point. 67th Tigers (talk) 13:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Maryland Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maryland Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

through the Shenandoah Valley?[edit]

  • Lee moved north with 55,000 men through the Shenandoah Valley - From Manassas to Leesburg through the Shenandoah Valley? Is it possible? --Muhranoff (talk) 04:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maryland_campaign&oldid=1203907775"