Talk:Mark Mitchell (New Zealand politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Mitchell (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mercenary in lead[edit]

What’s with the IP edits removing “mercenary” from the lead section? He spent years in Iraq as a security contractor and started a $100+ million mercenary company which he later sold off, shouldn’t be contentious. I’ll add it back again, I assume there’s some busybodies not too happy about the recent news coverage. Dudsud (talk) 23:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The word "mercenary" appears in the lead only. As the lead is supposed to be a summary of the article, it would be appropriate for the word to also be used in the body of the article. That way, it's far less contentious, Dudsud. Schwede66 23:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to either edit the body to include that term, or use another term like “security contractor” depending on what is used in the body. Dudsud (talk) 05:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]