Talk:Manuel Carpio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Mexican poet Manuel Carpio wrote the earliest known published version of the ghost La Llorona in 1849? Source: "By “literary legend,” Paredes is referring to the stories about La Llorona in the other major category: accounts of the ghost’s human origins. He characterizes them as “literary” because many of the earliest of them arise in literary sources. The earliest such account that I could find comes from a poem by Manuel Carpio published in 1849 and entitled “La Llorona”" - Library of Congress

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • If the source doesn't make it that clear, I also have The Business Standard. SL93 (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggesting an ALT :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 16:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT0a ... that Manuel Carpio's 1849 poem is the earliest literary depiction of the weeping ghost, La Llorona?
    • I like this one better than mine. SL93 (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Interesting life, on few but good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The hook works, especially the second version. In the article, I recommend that you get his medical training and appearing at the UN to lead and/or infobox. He wasn't just a poet. If this was my topic I'd also get some of it in the hook, but up to you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]