Talk:Man O' War (game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

system17 link[edit]

Does anyone other than KTG (the site's owner) feel that the link to system17.com is appropriate for this article? If not, I'll remove it sometime tomorrow. Cheers --Pak21 16:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do. I think that the external links should be put back.194.80.178.1 00:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ Pak21, give it a rest. It is one of the largest websites for info on Man O' War. I am not going to copy and paste everything I have there here, so let the visitors see whatever isn't posted on Wikipedia. ~KTG

Lord Of The Rings mention[edit]

Does the fact that Lord of the Rings has a few fan-made naval models really have anything to do with Man O' War? Personally I don't think so. In an article about naval wargames, maybe (although even then debatable since such models are not official). But the models have absolutely no connection to the game this article is about, and as such I'm removing that part until someone can come up with a good reason to put it back in. Prophaniti 13:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The rules for Man O'War were adapted for the Lord of the Rings ships in Games Workshop's magazine White Dwarf [1]; the adapted rules are official, even if the ships aren't (note that ship-building guides were released in WD), and it was my belief that articles that deal with wargames concern the rules before the models. --Grimhelm 13:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The question is though, does the article (or any in White Dwarf) specifically say the rules were from Man O'War? I can't find a mention in the article you link to, though there may well be one of course. I'm not disputing the point, but this article is specifically about Man O'War, and the only reason to put something in is if it relates specifically to that. If it does then fair enough. Prophaniti 10:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I confused Man O'War with the Warhammer Boat rules found in the Warhammer supplement - The General Compendium, from which All at Sea is adapted. Your original suggestion of removing it is appropriate. --Grimhelm 17:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really necessary?[edit]

"either because they were lacking seafaring abilities (Wood Elves), missing from the main factions at that time (Ogres, Lizardmen), or both." The 'or both' is a bit stupid, yeah? It implies that a possibility was the latter and not the former, meaning that nonexistant races would have seafaring abilities. It's either they existed but werent seafaring, or they didn't exist. They can't be both, since there's no quantum physics involved. Shroedinger's cat is not a WH charater. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.131.228 (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scale?[edit]

What scale did this operate at? I get the sense that the ships were at one scale and individuals like dragonriders and balloons were another. Does anyone have any specifics? Wellspring (talk) 03:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear writing[edit]

"In this regard, the game mechanics proved some limiting factors" - does this just mean the rules were unduly complex and difficult to use? Notreallydavid (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Man O' War (game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100405230821/http://doomharbour.freehostia.com/Forum/ to http://doomharbour.freehostia.com/Forum

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]