Talk:Malvern Hills District

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire High‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Malvern, Great Malvern, the Malvern district, the Hills, and all the other Malverns, now make a rather complex collection of articles. I'm suggesting looking at merging some of this is some way or another. Best to reply on my talk page. Kudpung (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and has become a respected source of information. Contributors please be sure of your facts before before changing or deleting anything.Kudpung (talk) 23:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kudpung. I have re-added a link to the official MHDC TIC - it seems relevant to the page. I have left the link to the geocities Tenbury website. As the site focusses solely on Tenbury, I think this link is better placed on the Tenbury page (where it is already present), but it's not worth arguing about. GyroMagician (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Thanks for the insight GyroMagician :)
I've also been editing and updating many other pages on places in the Malvern area; anything you can do to help would be much appreciated. Kudpung (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civil parishes[edit]

Al these villages in MHD need to included in the category Villages of Worcestershire. Many of these CPs already have their own Wiki pages, the red links show the ones that still need to be created. This page: of the Malvern Hills District Council gives the full list with links to the web sites of the parishes that have one. --Kudpung (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I think I'm being slow. Where'd they go? GyroMagician (talk) 13:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I think the drop-down I created covers this now. But most of the stubs need coords. the bot will add the maps. More talk will be centralised if we get the Wocs project going.--Kudpung (talk) 10:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queenhill[edit]

"(Redirected from Queenhill, Worcestershire)". The only reference to Queenhill on the Malvern District page is in the long list of small parishes. This is rather useless when you want to know something about Queenhill--like does it exist? did it ever exist? Victoria County History does not included it.

--Oldontarian (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my query on Queenhill last week, I have now discovered that it is a former civil parish in the part of Worcestershire now known as the Malvern District. Discussion of it can be found in Victoria County History of Worcestershire, volume 4, section on Ripple and in A Vision of Britain through Time.

I leave it to someone more acquainted with Wikipedia and Worcestershire to write the article. --Oldontarian (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article on Queenhill exists already. The spurious redirect has been deleted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malvern Hills District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080626020736/http://www.britishgasnews.co.uk/managed_content/files/pdf/greenCity.pdf to http://www.britishgasnews.co.uk/managed_content/files/pdf/greenCity.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]