Talk:MailScanner

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Documentation[edit]

MailScanner is horribly underdocumented. There is a help 'wiki' which is vague and not very helpful. There is also a book you can buy if you fancy paying to use what is supposed to be free software. It's not a bad program once you figure it out, but it's a bit of a CPU hog. Anjouli 14:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote this article?[edit]

It is horribly biased, i suspect it is written by mailscanner people. This needs a complete rewrite. --Benediktkr (talk) 14:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In what way is it "horribly biased"? It seems reasonably descriptive, fair and sourced. Could you identify what you think is wrong with it? (By the way, to answer your title "Who wrote this article?", the answer is that, like all WP articles, the writing is open for anyone, yourself included, to contribute. If you look at its history, you'll see several different contributors. Feel free to join in!) Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not long after the anti-phishing measure was introduced I noticed that Mailscanner was opening my emails before they arrived on my computer and corrupting the contents of genuine email messages by adding (without permission) bogus warnings. Sadly, real phishing emails are coming through totally untouched by Mailscanner. I have pointed this problem out in the article. It's a pity as the way this measure was implemented has damaged the reputation of an otherwise useful product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.208.114.13 (talk) 10:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MailScanner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010160528/http://wiki.mailscanner.info/ to http://wiki.mailscanner.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear[edit]

It wasn't until the last sentence of the second section that realized it might not be appropriate to install this software on my home PC as anti-email spying. I suspect jargon is why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:109E:F0B8:D19C:3255 (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]