Talk:Magna Carta: The Phantom of Avalanche

Translation

I would like to contribute a Korean version of this article, though I'm still pretty unfamiliar with Wikipedia, and am not sure how to go about doing this. I consulted the help page, though I couldn't find any relevant information. Perhaps this is my fault--I'm not very good at navigating Wikipedia's help section...

Any help would be appreciated. -Mhuddleston

Regarding recent edit / translation patch

I'm not sure who added this recent translation patch, though I've traced it back to a forum which engages in pirating and other illegal activities. I tried to check the legitimacy of the files, however, and they were all corrupt. But from what I gather, the project is far from complete, and hardly poses any purpose to this article. At best, this was probably a self-promotion attempt on the editor's part. Grendel 03:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

File:S calintz.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:S calintz.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:S calintz.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Reassessment request

Assessed this article as Start, low- there are no citation, the largest section of the article is a detailed description of every character in the game, what little gameplay section there is does not really explain how the game is played, only one of the mechanics, and there is no reception or development sections. In video game articles, the flow should be gameplay->plot (with characters first if needed)->development (if available)->reception. Moving the importance rating from mid to low because there is no assertion in the article as to why this game is more important than the vast majority of games- mid is typically reserved for high-profile games that have a large influence on the industry or popular culture. --PresN 19:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)