Talk:Magic Quadrant/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Most of the links are broken
Two problems with this article:
- Most of the links in that huge table are broken. They all redirect to the same generic Gartner page (URL format is gartner.com/*/*/expiration_page/expiration_page.jsp), saying that the content access has expired, and that the associated material may be purchased for a couple hundred, or thousand dollars, for historical purposes.
- Much of the criticism of Gartner Magic Quadrant is criticism of Gartner in general. It isn't exclusive to their not-so-magic quadrant. It is valid criticism, but I don't believe that it belongs in an article on Wikipedia.
No, I'm wrong. I would suggest that this be migrated to the Gartner article. The Magic Quadrant could be mentioned there, rather than maintaining this separate entry. --FeralOink (talk) 03:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)