Talk:Macropomoides

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macropomoides article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology: Lobe-Fins Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lobe-Fins task force (assessed as Low-importance).

May i use these sources instead?[edit]

https://www.academia.edu/7697668/The_Prehistoric_Survivor_Paradigm_And_More_On_Possible_Post-Cretaceous_Plesiosaurs? https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1075889/? https://fauna-palaestina-part-1.webs.com/faunapalaestina4.htm--Bubblesorg (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not because the first is a cryptozoologist's rant against his critics, and the second two URLs lead to material written by the exact same crackpot devotee of Creationist crank Harun Yahya whose nonsense I've deleted from this article. I mean, are you aware that Khalaf never actually has ever ever bothered to ever provide even a drawing of either Macropomoides miocaenius or M. palestina? I mean, it doesn't strike you as odd?--Mr Fink (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah--Bubblesorg (talk) 15:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then please stop suggesting we use these garbage sources, please!--Mr Fink (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i might have been fooled by "BioLib is an international encyclopedia of plants, fungi and animals.

Apart from taxonomic system you can visit our gallery, glossary, vernacular names dictionary, database of links and literature, systems of biotopes, discussion forum and several other functions related to biology.

It is a non-commercial educational project intended to be used both by experts and general public. Its content can be expanded by user contributions." on the biolib source--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Their credibility has been severely damaged, if not shot to Hell entirely if they will blindly accept the bilge of a crackpot like Khalaf's.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So that means the only credible Cenozoic celocanth the one from Sweden not this isreli one, plus he mentions palastine, not even a country recognized by most of the world (such things can get foreign scientist confused) . So why even mention it unless he is a bias person, although where does it say he supports Harun Yahya? i have heard about Harun Yahya but still. --Bubblesorg (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]