Talk:Mackintosh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additional source of information[edit]

There is some additional material on the current Mackintosh company at this Google cached version of an article on thefashionspot.com in 2004.

As this is a cache article, it would probably be worth gathering information from it before it disappears. -- Solipsist 18:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think it moved here. It seems to be a copy and paste of a newspaper article, which is similar to this 2002 Scotsman piece. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here is an interesting 2007 article, which names Daniel Dunko as a 31-year-old entrepreneur who bought the Cumbernauld company in the 1990s and apparently oversaw its revivial. Maybe worth someone looking to include that in the article. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error in origins[edit]

Judging by Charles Macintosh's entry at the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, we have got it wrong regarding the relationship of Hancock and Mackintosh. See http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/17541 (subscription or library card needed)

Also perhaps useful: http://www.lakelandelements.com/rainwearhistory/notes/mackintosh_heyday.htm (extract from S. Levitt 'Manchester Mackintoshes: A History of the Rubberized Garment Trade in Manchester', published in Textile History in 1986. ) Be nice to get a look at the whole article.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 01:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Against the 'k'[edit]

I am against the use o K in Mackintosh as used presently in this article. Obviously it is correctly spelled without a k, and those who use the letter are in error. Why should wikipedia perpetuate this error teaching new people others' mistakes? — Nicholas (reply) @ 07:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article itself seems to support this argument. --BDD (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mackintosh with the K is a brand name, Macintosh without the K is the generic for this type of raincoat. It seems to me pretty obvious that the entry is (and ought to be) about the generic type of raincoat named for its inventor, with a necessary subsidiary mention of the variantly spelt brand which traces its roots (though not a neatly as suggested here) to the same man. Or is Wikipedia now substituting copyright protected brand names and approved corporate histories for common English words and scholarship? TheCormac (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree should be a redirect from the K form to the correct origins cf Hoover: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_cleaner —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 06:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mackintosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mackintosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mackintosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mackintosh&oldid=1203823398"