Talk:Ma Xiaotian

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Quotes about US bombing of Chinese embassy in Belgrade and NATO attack in Pakistan[edit]

In a meeting with US officials sometime just after the 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan, Chinese general Ma Xiaotian sarcastically remarked "Were you using the wrong maps again?", referring to the 1999 US bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, which the US blamed on faulty maps, but which China has always suspected was deliberate.

Now this is a brilliant remark, and I think we should include it. It provides a unique insight into the general.

The remark was made in an official meeting, and the 2011 incident was directly compared to one of the most sensitive events in US-China relations (US bombing of Chinese embassy), as the sources below seem to agree. It is a data point that indicates how China saw the event and relations with the US/NATO. Observers have commented on this remark, calling it "jibbing" and "priceless". I suggest we include it on this page. My earlier edit that added this quote was removed, hence this talk section.

Sources:
https://jamestown.org/program/china-and-nato-grappling-with-beijings-hopes-and-fears/

https://web.archive.org/web/20121117053251/http://blog.gmfus.org/2012/05/23/seizing-opportunities-with-a-less-reserved-beijing/
(by Andrew Small, author of the definitive book on China-Pakistan relations)

http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2012/07/quote-of-day-mapping-lie.html

We should include this remark on this page, as it adds to the readers' knowledge of Ma Xiaotian and his wit, sarcasm, and understanding of current affairs.

Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Honoredebalzac345: I disagree. The remark was quoted by the Small, writing an article for the German Marshall Fund, and then picked up from that source by James Weitz writing for the Jamestown Foundation. Both used the quote to note that the state of China-NATO relations was still frosty in 2011 following the 1999 bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. While there is an argument to be made that Ma's remark merits inclusion in an appropriate article (possibly at China–United States relations since there is not a China–NATO relations article), with discussion of its significance in terms of the long-term rancor held by China over the Belgrade action, the simple retelling of the remark, with observations of its "cutting" or "jibing" nature, is not terribly helpful to understanding Ma. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, would it help if I included more analysis from the sources and gave the context of China-US relations? I believe that we are not in much disagreement here. I was actually thinking of including more analysis, but thought that it would take away from the brilliance of the quote, which I believe stands or itself. Moreover readers can always read the sources and analysis for themselves. Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Honoredebalzac345: The remark is not really all that clever or brilliant, and unless placed in proper context, stands only as a "clever quip" but provides little insight into anything. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can agree to disagree on the level of brilliance or sarcasm displayed by the quote, but clearly multiple sources found it important enough to write about it. And our job is to just cite those sources. I believe that if I included a few lines of analysis from the cited sources about the then state of China-NATO/US relations, that would enable us to reach consensus. That would also put the quote in the proper context, so the need for readers to click on the links is further reduced. This applies to both Wiki pages. Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Honoredebalzac345: While I might agree that a discussion of the quote has a place on the 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan page, I believe including it here on this page would give the incident undue weight. It was, after all, a single tossed off remark; it was not the highlight of Ma's career. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I'll make the change in the 2011 NATO attack page, and we'll keep the discussion for this page for the future.

Moreover, I don't think we have to analyze or contextualize it too much, beyond a point. That's up to the reader to decide. If we overdo it, we risk OR and SYNTH. After all, you don't really know if the general felt rancor or anything else, thats just an assumption. We don't REALLY know. What best we can do is simply paraphrase what the sources themselves say, at most. Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 08:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Honoredebalzac345: We don't know; we can only report what the reliable sources tell us, and they tell us that his remark reflected longstanding rancor about the 1999 Belgrade incident. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]